Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare BackBox.org and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (61.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (51.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
BackBox.org
Star Rating
(13)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (61.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about BackBox.orgRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Star Rating
(936)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Red Hat Enterprise LinuxSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Red Hat Enterprise Linux excels in "Quality of Support" with a score of 8.8, while BackBox.org falls short with a score of 7.5, indicating that users find Red Hat's support more reliable and responsive.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat Enterprise Linux has a higher "Meets Requirements" score of 9.1 compared to BackBox.org's 8.6, suggesting that Red Hat better aligns with user needs and expectations.
- G2 users highlight that Red Hat's "Performance Management" score of 9.0 outshines BackBox.org, which does not have a comparable score, indicating that users find Red Hat more effective in managing system performance.
- Users on G2 note that Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers superior "Automatic Security Updates" with a score of 8.9, while BackBox.org's security update features are less robust, scoring 9.2 but lacking in automatic capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat's "Scalability" score of 8.7 is a significant advantage, as it allows for better growth and resource management compared to BackBox.org, which does not provide a comparable score in this area.
- Users say that Red Hat Enterprise Linux's "OS Integration" score of 8.8 is a strong point, making it easier to integrate with existing systems, while BackBox.org does not have a similar level of integration support, which can hinder user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
BackBox.org
No pricing availableRed Hat Enterprise Linux
No pricing availableFree Trial
BackBox.org
No trial information availableRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
7
9.1
484
Ease of Use
8.8
7
8.4
750
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.5
557
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.5
288
Quality of Support
7.9
7
8.8
468
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.8
275
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
7
8.9
464
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
8.6
39
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.6
37
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
37
Not enough data
8.5
38
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
9.0
38
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Application Support
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.5
21
System Capability
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Security
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
9.3
21
Memory Management - Operating System
Not enough data
8.7
17
Device Management - Operating System
Not enough data
8.5
17
Backup and Recovery - Operating System
Not enough data
7.3
16
Error Detection - Operating System
Not enough data
7.9
17
Security
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
BackBox.org and Red Hat Enterprise Linux are categorized as Operating System
Unique Categories
BackBox.org has no unique categories
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is categorized as IoT Operating Systems, Server Virtualization, and Container Engine
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
BackBox.org
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer & Network Security
30.8%
Computer Software
15.4%
Banking
15.4%
Security and Investigations
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Other
23.1%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Computer Software
11.3%
Telecommunications
6.3%
Financial Services
5.8%
Computer & Network Security
5.0%
Other
51.4%
Discussions
Is BackBox good for programming?
1 Comment
EP
Of course. It's Linux! ☺Read more
BackBox.org has no more discussions with answers
What in RHEL you guys love?
3 Comments
LL
Guys, if you are looking for love you need to try Ladadate dating site. This is a great solution for all single people. I also want to share with you a cool...Read more
which is better centos or rhel?
1 Comment
MM
CentOS prior to 8 was great but now they have the stream model and I am not sure I would put production machines on anything like that but I have not done...Read more
How to use RedHat Containers for Virtualization?
1 Comment
GS
If container-native virtualization is enabled for let’s say an open shift cluster, you can create and add virtualized applications from the service catalog...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
