Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ActiveBatch and OpCon 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
StorageLink
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
JSCAPE MFT Server
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SFTP To Go
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Enterprise (39.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
ActiveBatch
Star Rating
(213)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about ActiveBatchOpCon
Star Rating
(30)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (39.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpConSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ActiveBatch Workload Automation excels in "Job Scheduling" with a score of 9.6, highlighting its intuitive interface and flexibility in scheduling tasks, while OpCon, with a score of 9.1, is noted for its reliability but lacks some of the advanced scheduling features that ActiveBatch offers.
- Reviewers mention that ActiveBatch's "Ease of Setup" is rated at 8.3, which is higher than OpCon's 7.8, indicating that users find ActiveBatch more straightforward to implement, particularly for complex environments.
- G2 users highlight ActiveBatch's superior "Error Alerts" functionality, scoring 9.3 compared to OpCon's 8.5. Users appreciate the proactive notifications that help in quickly addressing issues before they escalate.
- Users on G2 report that ActiveBatch's "Multi-platform support" is rated at 9.3, making it a preferred choice for organizations with diverse IT environments, while OpCon's support is slightly lower, which may limit its appeal for users needing extensive cross-platform capabilities.
- Reviewers say that ActiveBatch's "Quality of Support" is rated at 8.9, with many praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, whereas OpCon, with a score of 8.5, has received mixed feedback regarding the timeliness of their support services.
- Users report that ActiveBatch's "Intelligent Automation" features, scoring 9.1, provide advanced capabilities that enhance operational efficiency, while OpCon, lacking in this area, is seen as more traditional in its automation approach, which may not meet the needs of users looking for cutting-edge solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ActiveBatch
Simple, Usage-Based Pricing
Contact Us
- Ease of use - connect to your entire tech stack with our low-code API adapter and no-code connectors for SQL Server, SharePoint, Informatica, ServiceNow, VMware and more.
- Outstanding out-of-the-box features, including predictive SLA, change management, auto-remediation and a complete managed transfer file suite.
- Monitoring, alerting and reporting - reduce time troubleshooting and manage dependencies better with flexible and customizable monitoring and alerting.
OpCon
No pricing availableFree Trial
ActiveBatch
Free Trial is available
OpCon
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
163
9.1
25
Ease of Use
8.8
161
8.9
25
Ease of Setup
8.4
112
7.8
9
Ease of Admin
8.7
101
7.0
9
Quality of Support
8.9
155
8.5
25
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
99
9.0
8
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
150
10.0
22
Features by Category
Automation
9.3
98
9.4
18
9.0
92
8.6
17
9.1
57
Not enough data
Administration
9.0
96
8.2
17
9.2
90
9.0
17
8.9
75
8.8
15
9.0
55
Not enough data
9.1
58
Not enough data
9.1
52
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
100
9.1
17
8.7
77
9.0
15
9.0
50
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Workload Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Delivery
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.4
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
39
|
Verified
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
24
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
44
|
Verified
Not enough data
7.8
45
|
Verified
Not enough data
Governance
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.6
34
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.8
46
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
36
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
47
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation
9.4
21
Not enough data
9.2
20
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
9.0
18
Not enough data
Functionality
8.6
18
Not enough data
9.2
21
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
Administration
9.3
22
Not enough data
9.3
23
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Warehouse Automation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Process Orchestration
8.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.7
6
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration & Adaptability - Process Orchestration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ActiveBatch and OpCon are categorized as Workload Automation
Unique Categories
ActiveBatch is categorized as Data Warehouse Automation, Managed File Transfer (MFT), and Process Orchestration
OpCon has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ActiveBatch
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpCon
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
18.0%
Financial Services
17.1%
Hospital & Health Care
7.6%
Insurance
6.6%
Banking
6.2%
Other
44.5%
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Online Media
10.7%
Banking
10.7%
Telecommunications
7.1%
Investment Management
7.1%
Other
42.9%
Discussions
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job. This is one area where the documentation can use recommendations. For example, I want to see how the job performed, via the log, from 10 days ago. Today, the log would show GetFile failed if older than three days, or thereabouts.
1 Comment
KW
All jobs have properties that determine how job log files are managed. The factory default setting is Centrally Managed Logging. This means that the location...Read more
What is the best way to retain 10 days of log information on each job?
1 Comment
NA
create a log file instead of having active batch manage it,Read more
ActiveBatch has no more discussions with answers
OpCon has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
