Users report that SolidWorks Flow Simulation excels in its 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring 8.8, which reviewers mention makes it easier to visualize fluid dynamics in designs compared to Abaqus, which scored 6.4 in this area.
Reviewers mention that the ease of use for SolidWorks Flow Simulation is rated at 8.3, making it more user-friendly for beginners, while Abaqus has a lower score of 7.5, indicating a steeper learning curve for new users.
G2 users highlight that SolidWorks Flow Simulation's documentation received a score of 8.7, which reviewers say is comprehensive and helpful, whereas Abaqus, with a score of 7.0, is noted for having less accessible documentation.
Users on G2 report that SolidWorks Flow Simulation's integration capabilities are rated at 8.5, allowing for seamless collaboration with other SolidWorks tools, while Abaqus, scoring 8.0, is seen as slightly less integrated within its ecosystem.
Reviewers mention that Abaqus shines in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, which users say provides more advanced simulation capabilities compared to SolidWorks Flow Simulation's score of 7.7 in the same category.
Users say that the quality of support for SolidWorks Flow Simulation is rated at 8.3, with many reviewers praising the responsiveness of the support team, while Abaqus, with a score of 8.1, is noted for being slightly less responsive in comparison.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
SolidWorks Flow Simulation
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.6
30
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.3
30
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.3
30
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.