Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare Abaqus and Ansys Icepak

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
Abaqus
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Abaqus
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak
Star Rating
(25)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Information
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Ansys Icepak
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that Ansys Icepak excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.2, matching Abaqus, but reviewers mention that Icepak's specific feature for thermal management in electronics is particularly beneficial for small businesses.
  • Reviewers mention that Abaqus shines in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, highlighting its robust capabilities for structural simulations, which users say is essential for complex engineering projects.
  • G2 users indicate that Ansys Icepak's 3D/solid modeling tools score 6.9, which is higher than Abaqus's 6.4, suggesting that Icepak offers a more user-friendly interface for creating detailed thermal models.
  • Users on G2 report that Abaqus provides superior multibody dynamics capabilities with a score of 8.1 compared to Icepak's 6.4, making it a preferred choice for users focused on dynamic simulations.
  • Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Ansys Icepak is rated at 8.5, which is higher than Abaqus's 8.1, indicating that users feel more supported when troubleshooting issues with Icepak.
  • Users say that while both products have similar scores for rendering tools, Abaqus's rendering capabilities at 7.0 are noted to be more intuitive, allowing for better visualization of complex simulations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
Ansys Icepak
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
Ansys Icepak
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.9
18
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.1
19
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.5
18
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
9.4
19
Features by Category
7.8
24
7.4
21
Design
6.4
18
6.9
18
6.6
18
6.1
17
6.5
19
6.9
18
7.0
16
6.8
16
Tools
8.2
14
8.2
18
8.8
22
8.2
17
8.1
16
6.4
12
Work
7.9
15
7.6
13
8.1
13
7.6
13
8.4
18
8.2
14
8.0
14
6.9
12
8.0
11
7.8
15
Environment
7.0
15
7.8
13
8.3
12
7.8
13
8.5
13
7.4
13
8.6
18
7.4
15
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus
Abaqus
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak
Abaqus and Ansys Icepak are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus
Abaqus has no unique categories
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
46.9%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
24.5%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
28.6%
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
50.0%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
13.6%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
36.4%
Reviewers' Industry
Abaqus
Abaqus
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
31.8%
Consumer Electronics
13.6%
Automotive
13.6%
Semiconductors
9.1%
Telecommunications
4.5%
Other
27.3%
Alternatives
Abaqus
Abaqus Alternatives
Ansys Mechanical
Ansys Mechanical
Add Ansys Mechanical
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
SolidWorks Simulation
SolidWorks Simulation
Add SolidWorks Simulation
Altair HyperWorks
Altair HyperWorks
Add Altair HyperWorks
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak Alternatives
SolidWorks Simulation
SolidWorks Simulation
Add SolidWorks Simulation
MATLAB
MATLAB
Add MATLAB
SOLIDWORKS
SOLIDWORKS
Add SOLIDWORKS
Inventor
Inventor
Add Inventor
Discussions
Abaqus
Abaqus Discussions
Monty the Mongoose crying
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Ansys Icepak
Ansys Icepak Discussions
What is the best way of modeling two-phase immersion cooling?
1 Comment
Viral G.
VG
Hi Jimil, Icepak does not support multi-phase modeling. Ansys Fluent would be a better fit. Please feel free to connect with Ansys Support via...Read more
Ansys Icepak still has issues like it can't simulate inclined PCB why are these issues not sorted out?
1 Comment
Viral G.
VG
Hi Kula Segara.. Have you tried the advanced PCB modeling with Icepak in Ansys Electronics Desktop yet? Inclined PCBs are supported there. Please feel free...Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
Ansys Icepak has no more discussions with answers