# Top 10 Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway Alternatives & Competitors **Average Rating:** 4.9/5 **Total Number of Reviews:** 31 Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway is not the only option for Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software is a widely used technology, and many people are seeking easily administered, sophisticated software solutions with application integration, extensibility, and mobile support. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway include storage and security. The best overall Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway alternative is Progress MOVEit. Other similar apps like Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway are GoAnywhere MFT, Progress ShareFile, FileZilla, and Cleo Integration Cloud. Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway alternatives can be found in [Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) but may also be in [File Transfer Protocol (FTP) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) or [Cloud Content Collaboration Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/cloud-content-collaboration). ## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway - [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) - [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) - [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) - [FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/products/filezilla/reviews) - [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews) - [Files.com](https://www.g2.com/products/files-com/reviews) - [ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/products/activebatch/reviews) - [WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/products/winscp/reviews) - [AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-transfer-family/reviews) - [ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/products/exavault/reviews) ## Top 10 Alternatives to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway Recently Reviewed By G2 Community Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Hospital & Health Care, Education Management, and Government Administration, and find the best product for your business. ### 1. [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) By Progress Software **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 529 Exchanging files over the Internet shouldn’t be complicated. That’s why more than 40 million users from around the world rely on MOVEit – The Managed File Transfer Software from Progress to simplify and secure the file transfer tasks, save time, and improve communications. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, Progress MOVEit is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare Progress MOVEit with other alternatives:** - [Progress MOVEit vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress MOVEit vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-winscp) - [Progress MOVEit vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-moveit) - [Progress MOVEit vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-progress-moveit) ### 2. [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) By Fortra **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 437 GoAnywhere MFT is a managed file transfer solution which automates and secures file transfers using a centralized enterprise-level approach. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, GoAnywhere MFT is: - Slower to reach roi Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare GoAnywhere MFT with other alternatives:** - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-moveit) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-sharefile) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-winscp) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [GoAnywhere MFT vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-goanywhere-mft) ### 3. [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) By Progress Software **Average Rating:** 4.2/5 **Total Reviews:** 1,537 ShareFile offers secure file, sync, and sharing for your small or medium business. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, Progress ShareFile is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare Progress ShareFile with other alternatives:** - [Progress ShareFile vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-winscp) - [Progress ShareFile vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Progress ShareFile vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-progress-sharefile) ### 4. [FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/products/filezilla/reviews) By FileZilla **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 766 FileZilla is a free, open-source, cross-platform FTP application that includes both client and server components. It supports FTP, FTPS (FTP over SSL/TLS), and SFTP protocols, enabling secure and efficient file transfers across various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. FileZilla is renowned for its user-friendly interface and robust performance, making it a preferred choice for both novice and experienced users. Key Features and Functionality: - Protocol Support: Facilitates file transfers using FTP, FTPS, and SFTP protocols. - Cross-Platform Compatibility: Operates seamlessly on Windows, Linux, and macOS systems. - Large File Handling: Supports resuming and transferring files larger than 4GB. - Tabbed User Interface: Allows simultaneous browsing of multiple servers or directories. - Site Manager and Transfer Queue: Enables efficient management of server lists and file transfer tasks. - Drag & Drop Support: Simplifies the process of uploading and downloading files. - Configurable Transfer Speed Limits: Provides control over bandwidth usage during transfers. - Directory Comparison: Highlights differences between local and remote directories. - Remote File Editing: Allows direct editing of files on the server. - Synchronized Directory Browsing: Ensures parallel navigation between local and remote directories. - Remote File Search: Facilitates locating files on the server. Primary Value and User Solutions: FileZilla addresses the need for a reliable and secure method of transferring files between local machines and remote servers. Its support for multiple protocols ensures compatibility with various server configurations, while the intuitive interface and advanced features like directory comparison and remote file editing enhance user productivity. By offering a free, open-source solution, FileZilla provides an accessible and efficient tool for web developers, system administrators, and anyone requiring robust file transfer capabilities. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, FileZilla is: - Slower to reach roi Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare FileZilla with other alternatives:** - [FileZilla vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-moveit) - [FileZilla vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [FileZilla vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-progress-sharefile) - [FileZilla vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-filezilla) - [FileZilla vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-files-com) - [FileZilla vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-filezilla) - [FileZilla vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-winscp) - [FileZilla vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-filezilla) - [FileZilla vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-filezilla) ### 5. [Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/products/cleo-integration-cloud/reviews) By Cleo **Average Rating:** 4.4/5 **Total Reviews:** 593 Cleo Integration Cloud is an ecosystem integration platform that makes it easy to build, automate and manage B2B, application, cloud, and data integrations. It's scalable, intuitive, and requires no custom code or specialized skillsets to manage daily integration operations. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, Cleo Integration Cloud is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare Cleo Integration Cloud with other alternatives:** - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-moveit) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-filezilla) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-files-com) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-winscp) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [Cleo Integration Cloud vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-exavault) ### 6. [Files.com](https://www.g2.com/products/files-com/reviews) By Files.com **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 296 Files.com is a cloud-native/SaaS file automation and integration platform that provides a cloud-centric approach to enterprise grade, file-based integrations and automations while emphasizing security, compliance, and data residency for business-critical file transfers and exchanges. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, Files.com is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive - Easier to set up Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare Files.com with other alternatives:** - [Files.com vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-progress-moveit) - [Files.com vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [Files.com vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-progress-sharefile) - [Files.com vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-files-com) - [Files.com vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-files-com) - [Files.com vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-files-com) - [Files.com vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-winscp) - [Files.com vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-files-com) - [Files.com vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-files-com) ### 7. [ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/products/activebatch/reviews) By Redwood Software **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 235 ActiveBatch Workload Automation offers a powerful automation engine, rich library of integrations, and intuitive workflow designer for improved performance and end-to-end visibility of processes. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, ActiveBatch is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare ActiveBatch with other alternatives:** - [ActiveBatch vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-moveit) - [ActiveBatch vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [ActiveBatch vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-progress-sharefile) - [ActiveBatch vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-filezilla) - [ActiveBatch vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [ActiveBatch vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-files-com) - [ActiveBatch vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-winscp) - [ActiveBatch vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-activebatch) - [ActiveBatch vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-exavault) ### 8. [WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/products/winscp/reviews) By WinSCP **Average Rating:** 4.6/5 **Total Reviews:** 233 WinSCP is a free and open-source file transfer client for Microsoft Windows, supporting protocols such as SFTP, SCP, FTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3. Its primary function is to facilitate secure file transfers between a local and a remote computer. Beyond file transfers, WinSCP offers basic file management and synchronization capabilities, making it a versatile tool for users who require reliable and secure file operations. Key Features and Functionality: - Graphical User Interface: Provides an intuitive interface with options resembling either Windows File Explorer or Norton Commander, catering to user preferences. - Protocol Support: Supports a variety of protocols, including SFTP, SCP, FTP, WebDAV, and Amazon S3, ensuring compatibility with diverse server configurations. - Integrated Text Editor: Allows users to edit remote text files directly within the application, streamlining workflows. - Scripting and Automation: Offers batch file scripting, a command-line interface, and a .NET assembly for advanced programming tasks, enabling automation of file transfer processes. - Directory Synchronization: Supports various methods for synchronizing directories, both semi-automatically and fully automatically, ensuring consistency between local and remote files. - Security Features: Utilizes Secure Shell (SSH) for secure transfers and supports SSH password, keyboard-interactive, public key, and Kerberos (GSS) authentication methods. - Windows Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Windows through drag-and-drop functionality, URL handling, shortcut icons, and jump lists, enhancing user convenience. Primary Value and User Solutions: WinSCP addresses the need for secure, efficient, and user-friendly file transfer and management solutions on the Windows platform. By supporting multiple protocols and offering features like integrated editing, scripting, and synchronization, it simplifies complex file operations for users ranging from system administrators to developers. Its emphasis on security ensures that sensitive data is transferred safely, while its customizable interface and automation capabilities enhance productivity and streamline workflows. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, WinSCP is: - Slower to reach roi - Easier to set up Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway-vs-winscp) **Compare WinSCP with other alternatives:** - [WinSCP vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-moveit-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/goanywhere-mft-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/progress-sharefile-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/filezilla-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/files-com-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-winscp) - [WinSCP vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-winscp) ### 9. [AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/products/aws-transfer-family/reviews) By Amazon Web Services (AWS) **Average Rating:** 4.3/5 **Total Reviews:** 211 Easily manage file transfers and modernize your transfer workflows within hours by using your existing authentication systems. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, AWS Transfer Family is: - Slower to reach roi - More expensive Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare AWS Transfer Family with other alternatives:** - [AWS Transfer Family vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-moveit) - [AWS Transfer Family vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-progress-sharefile) - [AWS Transfer Family vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-filezilla) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-cleo-integration-cloud) - [AWS Transfer Family vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-files-com) - [AWS Transfer Family vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-activebatch) - [AWS Transfer Family vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-winscp) - [AWS Transfer Family vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-exavault) ### 10. [ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/products/exavault/reviews) By Files.com **Average Rating:** 4.5/5 **Total Reviews:** 194 ExaVault FTP platform lets you create a hosted FTP server in just seconds, with full support for manual and automated file transfers. Reviewers say compared to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, ExaVault is: - Slower to reach roi - Easier to set up - More usable Categories in common with Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway: [File Transfer Protocol (FTP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/file-transfer-protocol-ftp), [Managed File Transfer (MFT)](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft) **Compare:** [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway vs ExaVault](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway) **Compare ExaVault with other alternatives:** - [ExaVault vs Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-progress-moveit) - [ExaVault vs GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-goanywhere-mft) - [ExaVault vs Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-progress-sharefile) - [ExaVault vs FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-filezilla) - [ExaVault vs Cleo Integration Cloud](https://www.g2.com/compare/cleo-integration-cloud-vs-exavault) - [ExaVault vs Files.com](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-files-com) - [ExaVault vs ActiveBatch](https://www.g2.com/compare/activebatch-vs-exavault) - [ExaVault vs WinSCP](https://www.g2.com/compare/exavault-vs-winscp) - [ExaVault vs AWS Transfer Family](https://www.g2.com/compare/aws-transfer-family-vs-exavault) --- ## Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway Alternatives FAQs ### Which Managed File Transfer (MFT) tools do reviewers recommend instead of Thorn Technologies SFTP...? Reviewers highly recommend [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) for its robust security, automation capabilities, compliance features, and ease of use, especially in enterprise environments requiring detailed auditing and workflow automation. [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) is praised for its extensive workflow automation, centralized management, strong integration with cloud platforms like AWS and Azure, and user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, making it a top choice for organizations seeking flexible and scalable managed file transfer solutions. [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) is recommended for secure file sharing and collaboration with clients, offering strong compliance and integration with Microsoft Office and Salesforce. [FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/products/filezilla/reviews) is favored for its simplicity, reliability, cross-platform support, and free open-source availability, making it suitable for straightforward FTP/SFTP file transfer needs. ### How does Thorn Technologies SFTP... compare to Progress MOVEit? According to G2 data, [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway](https://www.g2.com/products/thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway/reviews) outperforms [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) in key user-rated dimensions. Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway scores 9.9 in Support versus MOVEit's 8.6, a 1.3-point lead, and 9.8 in Ease of Doing Business compared to MOVEit's 9.1, a 0.7-point advantage. It also leads in Meeting Requirements (9.5 vs 9.0), Usability (9.4 vs 8.9), Setup Ease (9.1 vs 8.7), and Administration Ease (9.5 vs 8.8), with deltas ranging from 0.4 to 0.7 points. Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway is praised for its simplicity, reliability, strong security, and exceptional customer support, with 12 mentions highlighting support excellence and 8 noting ease of use. It offers straightforward deployment and stable, secure file transfers with minimal upkeep. Conversely, Progress MOVEit, with a 4.4-star average rating from 527 reviews, is recognized for its robust automation, security features, and enterprise-grade compliance capabilities, including encryption, role-based access control, and detailed audit trails. MOVEit supports complex workflows with a drag-and-drop interface and integrates well with various systems. However, it has a steeper learning curve, occasional UI complexity, and some users report challenges with setup and troubleshooting. Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway, rated 4.9 stars across 31 reviews, is favored for its ease of setup, reliability, and customer support responsiveness, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing straightforward, secure SFTP solutions. MOVEit offers more advanced workflow automation and enterprise features but at the cost of complexity and a higher learning curve. ### Why do users choose Progress MOVEit over Thorn Technologies SFTP...? Users choose [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) over [Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway](https://www.g2.com/products/thorn-technologies-sftp-gateway/reviews) primarily for its comprehensive managed file transfer capabilities and advanced automation features. MOVEit excels in automating complex, conditional file-transfer workflows with a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, which reduces manual effort and operational risk. It provides robust security measures including end-to-end encryption, role-based access control, detailed logging, and audit trails, making it well-suited for enterprises with strict compliance requirements. MOVEit's integration with various protocols and cloud services, along with its ability to centralize partner connections and workflows, appeals to organizations managing high-volume and complex file transfers. Additionally, MOVEit's scalability and support for large data spikes provide reliability for demanding environments. Despite a steeper learning curve and occasional UI complexity, users value MOVEit's extensive feature set, automation capabilities, and enterprise-grade security, which justify its selection for organizations needing a powerful, secure, and compliant managed file transfer solution. Customer support and continuous product enhancements further reinforce MOVEit's appeal among users seeking advanced file transfer management beyond basic SFTP functionality. ### What are the best alternatives to Thorn Technologies SFTP...? The best alternatives to Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway include [Progress MOVEit](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-moveit/reviews) (4.4/5 with 527 reviews), [GoAnywhere MFT](https://www.g2.com/products/goanywhere-mft/reviews) (4.6/5 with 435 reviews), [Progress ShareFile](https://www.g2.com/products/progress-sharefile/reviews) (4.2/5 with 1535 reviews), and [FileZilla](https://www.g2.com/products/filezilla/reviews) (4.5/5 with 767 reviews). These alternatives offer a range of features from enterprise-grade automation and security to user-friendly interfaces and broad protocol support. ### What features do alternatives offer that Thorn Technologies SFTP... does not? Thorn Technologies SFTP Gateway lacks advanced workflow orchestration, built-in data transformation, advanced analytics, modern UI/UX, and extensive scalability and monitoring features that are present in some alternatives. It also does not natively support content routing, which is available in Progress MOVEit and GoAnywhere MFT. ## Explore Articles - [What is the top-rated practice management software for law firms?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-top-rated-practice-management-software-for-law-firms) - [Which location intelligence software provides predictive modeling features?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-location-intelligence-software-provides-predictive-modeling-features) - [Best AI code generation software for multi-language support and cross-stack development](https://www.g2.com/discussions/best-ai-code-generation-software-for-multi-language-support-and-cross-stack-development) - [Top relational database options for small businesses](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-top-relational-database-options-for-small-businesses) - [What is the best network management tool for hybrid networks?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-best-network-management-tool-for-hybrid-networks) - [Digital Marketing Services in San Diego](https://www.g2.com/categories/digital-marketing/locations/san-diego-ca-us) ## Spotlight Categories - [Video Editing Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/video-editing) - [Data Observability Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/data-observability) - [Demand Side Platform (DSP)](https://www.g2.com/categories/demand-side-platform-dsp)