
I like that Sage Intacct has many different integration partners. We integrate with Martus for budgeting and forecasting. We also integrate with Concur for electronic expense reporting and invoice processing. Since moving from a traditional account number structure to Sage Intacct's dimension structure, we've been able to improve our reporting and data collection significantly. The dynamic allocation tools have cut our processing time down each month and has allowed us to better explain how these costs impact each ministry area of our organization. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Everything except accounts receivable can be handled at the top level, but accounts receivable (AR) has to be managed at the entity level, which is really confusing and makes it harder to track things down compared to when it's done at the top level. Also, the initial setup was quite a struggle; it was a huge conceptual change for my staff to move from the traditional account number structure to the dimension structure, which posed many challenges. We operate many separate entities that really are all part of one non profit but because of past history they remain separate reporting entities. The multi entity features of Sage Intacct has made this a very simple process to combine the necessary entities together for the external reporting. The only area where this has not worked well is in the AR module that requires everything to be done at the entity level so it takes more time to discover what entity the receivable is related to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Hi there, thank you for taking the time to share such a detailed and thoughtful review! It's genuinely exciting to hear how Sage Intacct's dimension structure, dynamic allocation tools, and multi-entity features have transformed your reporting, streamlined your vendor management, and cut your 1099 processing time in half — that's a real impact. We also appreciate your candid feedback about the AR module needing to be managed at the entity level. We understand how that can add friction when trying to track down receivables quickly. It may help to know that our AR multi-entity guidelines include tips on entity-specific document sequencing — for example, prefacing sequences with an entity identifier like INV-E1-10234 — so you can identify which entity a receivable belongs to at a glance without extra digging. We hope that resource makes things a bit smoother, and thank you again for such honest and constructive feedback. It truly helps us improve.
See how Sage Intacct improved

