Plum Pricing

Get a Custom Quote

Plum has not provided pricing information for this product or service. This is common practice for software sellers and service providers. The pricing insights provided here are based on user reviews and are intended to give you an indication of value. Alternatively, contact Plum to obtain current pricing.

Name	Price	Features
Mid-Market	$	40% less expensive than the avg. Succession Planning and Management product Read Mid-Market Reviews

Name

Price

Features

Mid-Market

$

40% less expensive

than the avg. Succession Planning and Management product

Read Mid-Market Reviews

Plum pricing & plans

Free Trial is available

Pricing information for Plum is supplied by the software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase Plum must be conducted with the seller.

Pricing information was last updated on December 18, 2020

Plum Alternatives Pricing

The following is a quick overview of editions offered by other Succession Planning and Management Software

CEIPAL ATS 1 to 5 users	$24 per userPer Month
PayPal On Website - Custom	$30per month	Customize your entire online checkout Accept credit cards and PayPal payments Take mobile payments anywhere Send customized invoices Connect with popular carts and platforms
Zoho Recruit STANDARD EDITION	$25/Recuiter/Month	Free Edition Features + Product Customization Field Level Security Custom Links Resume Parsing Formatted Resume Build your Careers Website Show More

Various alternatives pricing & plans

Free Trial is available

Pricing information for the above various Plum alternatives is supplied by the respective software provider or retrieved from publicly accessible pricing materials. Final cost negotiations to purchase any of these products must be conducted with the seller.

Plum Pricing-Related Review

CD

Chris D

General Manager

Events Services

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

Validated Reviewer

Verified Current User

Review source: Invitation from G2 on behalf of the seller

Mar 01, 2018

"Intuitive, simple and effective"

What do you like best?

The results. We have used Plum to evaluate candidates for positions ranging from managers to drivers. The candidates Plum profile has been a reliable predictor of success in each of the positions we've filled in the past year and a half using it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike?

No dislikes. I'd like to upgrade from the Basic level in order to access more features, but I don't have the openings to justify the increased cost. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Make the jump. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

We've streamlined our hiring process by requiring every candidate to complete the Plum profile before reviewing their resume. By beginning our evaluation process by reviewing candidates with the highest scoring Plum profile we have identified the best candidates much more quickly.

By being able to invite other team members to create the profile criteria I'm able to get better buy-in on the hires I make. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Helpful?

IN

Internal Consultant in Non-Profit Organization Management

Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)

Validated Reviewer

Review source: Invitation from G2 on behalf of the seller

Oct 17, 2018

"It's a personality test with some added bells"

What do you like best?

I think the IQ screening component is valuable though it is quite derivative of western high school standardised testing (if you are British, think: CATs tests). From speaking to colleagues, this is something that is not necessarily normal in other education systems, so there is potential for bias against African applicants (I work in Africa). I would imagine, it is able to determine if someone is not a high school graduate, or is not computer literate with relative ease. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike?

It's a personality test. Candidate's responses vary depending on mood, sleep and what they had for breakfast. Similarly, hiring managers probably have a perception of what they want in a character, but don't really know, beyond the patently obvious traits (reliable, hard-working etc.) It's value is limited to being a conversation starter, and as a conversation starter, it is a rather elaborate and expensive tool. I dislike the concept, the product is a pleasant looking vessel for a dubious, fledgling science. I am deeply uncomfortable that we screen candidates with such authority based on what this platform tells us. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

There is nothing wrong with the company, it's a slick product. I genuinely don't believe you can pigeon hole personality types so superficially. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems are you solving with the product? What benefits have you realized?

It allows us to to sift through thousands of CVs much quicker with, at least, a pretence that we are doing it scientifically. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Show Less

Response from of Plum

edit

Hi there,

We’re sorry that Plum hasn’t been meeting your expectations. We hope we can address some of your concerns!

We would first like to clarify that Plum does not use a traditional IQ test. Plum assesses fluid intelligence, instead of crystallized intelligence (which is what a traditional standardized test measures). Fluid intelligence is widely agreed-upon to be the most accurate predictor of future on-the-job success (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998). The method we use to assess fluid intelligence is Raven’s Progressive Matrices, which is particularly noted for its ability to NOT discriminate against particular groups, regardless of country of origin, race, gender, age, sexuality, etc. Our assessment only requires a grade 5 reading level, making it accessible even to those who are not high school graduates.

For the personality portion of our assessment, Plum leverages the Five-Factor (or “Big 5”) model of personality, which is scientifically validated to be an accurate means of measuring personality. In fact, when combined with the results of a fluid intelligence test, personality has been found to be highly predictive of job performance (Schmidt & Hunter, 1998). Research has also found that someone’s personality is highly stable, in that it changes little due to situational factors like how much sleep a person has had. Finally, leveraging the input of subject matter experts like hiring managers is a well-vetted method for determining role requirements, such as which personality traits are optimal for a role (Tett, Jackson, & Rothstein, 1991).

Plum is based in 50+ years of deep Industrial/Organizational research, and our current product is vetted by professors and PhD candidates based out of Central Michigan University and the University of Guelph, who would disagree that the peer-reviewed science is “dubious” or “fledgling.”

I would be happy to answer any further questions you have about the validity of our product, or I can send you a copy of our technical manual. You can reach out to me at leann@plum.io.

Leann Schneider, PhD, Product Manager at Plum

Helpful?

0

Add Comment

Share