Check Point SASE Pricing Overview

The simple yet effective ui makes it easy to deal with.

I've tried to work with different products, and the ui is almost always complicated in some way, while with check point, it is always simple and helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the support is a little slow, especially in critical situations where response time is crucial for effective problem handling. It would be good if this point is reviewed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Check Point SASE is how it combines network security and secure remote access into a unified cloud-based platform. It provides consistent security policies across users, devices, and locations without relying heavily on traditional perimeter-based infrastructure, which is extremely valuable in hybrid and distributed work environments.

I also appreciate the strong integration of security features like secure web gateway, zero trust access, threat prevention, and SD-WAN capabilities. Having these functions centralized improves visibility and simplifies management compared to handling multiple standalone security tools.

Another major advantage is the performance and scalability. Users can securely access applications and resources with a smoother experience while maintaining strong protection against threats. Overall, it helps improve both security posture and operational efficiency in modern cloud-driven environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the key problems that comes with Check Point SASE is the complexity of its operation in terms of managing the tool from the beginning of deployment up to the point where policies have been configured properly. In many instances, the software may seem a little too hard to understand, making it very challenging to use on a daily basis.

Performance can also be affected by various factors. For instance, users of Check Point SASE may sometimes face such problems as latency, unreliable connections, or slower access to applications due to passing traffic through several layers of security measures.

Moreover, some aspects of using Check Point SASE may seem fragmented, meaning that not all features have been well-integrated into the whole system. It may make troubleshooting harder since it will be difficult to solve the problem of any networking and security components.

Furthermore, the cost of using Check Point SASE may also be considered a disadvantage since licensing, advanced security features, and other aspects may require additional money. Also, the level of reporting and analysis provided by the product is not always satisfactory. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.