I really like Check Point SASE because it brings together networking and security in one place. This means I do not have to deal with a lot of things like VPN and SD-WAN and Zero Trust Network Access and Secure Web Gateway and Firewall-as-a-Service.

Check Point SASE has all these things in one place so I can manage them easily. This makes my job simpler. I can see everything that is going on.

Check Point SASE also keeps my users safe no matter where they are. The people in charge can manage everything from one place. This helps stop bad things from happening.

This helps reduce the amount of work I have to do to keep everything running smoothly and safely. Check Point SASE is very good, at keeping people out and this means my users can work from anywhere without any problems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area where Check Point SASE could do better is in making it easier to set up at configure policies especially for companies that are moving away from old network security systems.

Some advanced features take time to learn and fixing issues can be tricky because of all the security parts that are included.

For some companies Check Point SASE might be overkill if they only have networking requirements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

From an engineer’s perspective, Decentralized Security stands out because you get the security enforcement of a Cloud Web Gateway (SWG). It also delivers low latency by running a lightweight, granular filtering engine directly on the endpoint agent, so the system can enforce web filtering and processing locally. As a result, it helps reduce bandwidth strain as well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Painful integration with complex on-prem routing (non-BGP), plus log delays in the console. When a remote user complains that a critical application is being blocked, pulling up real-time, granular logs to see exactly which security layer (ZTNA, CASB, or URL Filtering) triggered the block can sometimes involve noticeable sync delays. Overall, responsiveness, per-user cost, and feature gating remain concerns. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Check Point SASE is how it combines network security and secure remote access into a unified cloud-based platform. It provides consistent security policies across users, devices, and locations without relying heavily on traditional perimeter-based infrastructure, which is extremely valuable in hybrid and distributed work environments.

I also appreciate the strong integration of security features like secure web gateway, zero trust access, threat prevention, and SD-WAN capabilities. Having these functions centralized improves visibility and simplifies management compared to handling multiple standalone security tools.

Another major advantage is the performance and scalability. Users can securely access applications and resources with a smoother experience while maintaining strong protection against threats. Overall, it helps improve both security posture and operational efficiency in modern cloud-driven environments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One of the key problems that comes with Check Point SASE is the complexity of its operation in terms of managing the tool from the beginning of deployment up to the point where policies have been configured properly. In many instances, the software may seem a little too hard to understand, making it very challenging to use on a daily basis.

Performance can also be affected by various factors. For instance, users of Check Point SASE may sometimes face such problems as latency, unreliable connections, or slower access to applications due to passing traffic through several layers of security measures.

Moreover, some aspects of using Check Point SASE may seem fragmented, meaning that not all features have been well-integrated into the whole system. It may make troubleshooting harder since it will be difficult to solve the problem of any networking and security components.

Furthermore, the cost of using Check Point SASE may also be considered a disadvantage since licensing, advanced security features, and other aspects may require additional money. Also, the level of reporting and analysis provided by the product is not always satisfactory. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like the most about Check Point SASE is that it combines networking and security in one platform. It greatly simplifies secure connection of remote users, branch offices and cloud applications, without the need for multiple separate solutions. I also like the centralized management to make it easier to enforce policies and see what’s going on in the environment. Its Zero Trust approach, secure web gateway and cloud-based security help improve protection, while still allowing for good performance for users. Overall, it makes it easier to operate, more secure, and easier to support a modern, hybrid workforce. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I’ve seen with Check Point SASE is that getting it up and running and creating policies isn’t always easy, particularly for organizations that are new to SASE or Zero Trust architectures. Some advanced features are not ready to be used by administrator immediately, they need the learning curve. However, the number of security layers involved sometimes makes troubleshooting connectivity or policy issues time consuming. Pricing can also be an issue for smaller organizations especially when there is a need to buy more licenses or advanced features. Overall, while the platform is powerful and feature-rich, it requires proper planning, training, and ongoing management to get the most value from it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like Check Point SASE for its fast global connectivity and the single intuitive dashboard. The direct routing through worldwide cloud points of presence eliminates VPN latency, which is great for efficiency. I also appreciate the centralized visibility that streamlines management and allows admins to enforce zero trust policies effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find setting new granular policies and dealing with log latency to be challenging in Check Point SASE. Also, while I found the initial setup easy, configuring it to our specific code was a bit difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate how Check Point SASE unifies networking and security into a single cloud-delivered service, which is crucial for today's hybrid work environments where users connect from various locations. It efficiently solves the issue of managing fragmented security tools by combining VPN, firewall, CASB, and SD-WAN into one platform. I really like the Zero Trust Network Access feature, as every connection is verified based on user identity, device posture, and application context, offering strong protection against insider threats and compromised accounts. The cloud-native scalability is another standout feature, making it easy to add new users or extend protection to new applications without requiring significant infrastructure changes. Furthermore, Check Point SASE works well with identity and access management platforms like Azure AD, Okta, and Ping Identity, allowing for strong authentication before granting access. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Deployment Complexity - Without powerful, initial setup can be challenging for smaller IT teams without prior Check Point experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about Check Point SASE is its ability to provide secure, policy-driven access while maintaining centralized visibility and control. From an OT security perspective, the combination of Zero Trust access, advanced threat prevention, and simplified management helps organizations securely connect remote users and sites without compromising security or operational reliability. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area where Check Point SASE could improve is its learning curve and administrative complexity compared to some cloud-native SASE competitors. Initial policy configuration and integration across multiple security services may require more expertise, particularly in large enterprise environments. Additionally, some organizations may find the licensing structure and overall cost higher than alternative solutions, especially for smaller deployments. However, these challenges are often outweighed by its strong security capabilities and comprehensive feature set. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The solution provides strong centralized security and access control for remote users and hybrid environments. I particularly appreciate the unified approach to secure connectivity, which simplifies managing VPN, web access, and policy enforcement from a single platform. It improves visibility over user traffic and helps reduce security risks without adding too much operational complexity once properly configured. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Check Point SASE provides strong security capabilities, there are some areas that could be improved. The initial configuration and onboarding process can be complex, especially for teams without prior experience with the platform. The administration interface may feel a bit dense at times, with many features spread across different menus, which can slow down navigation. In addition, troubleshooting certain connectivity or policy issues is not always straightforward and may require support assistance. Finally, documentation could be more simplified and clearer for faster adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Best overall , best for advanced threats prevention , best for zero architecture, Best for Global Edge Performance, Best for Unified Security Fabric.. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

it often introduces heavy vendor lock-in, high licensing costs, and complex migration phases that disrupt daily operations. Organizations frequently dislike the "all-in-one" feature gaps, where a vendor might offer elite security but provide weak network routing tools. Additionally, combining network and security operations forces teams to learn complex new cloud interfaces, which can lead to misconfigurations and employee frustration from overly restrictive login policies. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

1. Traffic will be secure and pass through their global network.

2. No hassle of SSL VPN

3. Cloud Controller/Security

4. Zero Trust Access.

5. No hardware Maintained. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There POP are not available in every country due to which traffic generated by some remote user can travel to their nearest POP which may cause some latency and price is little bit costlier than legacy SSL VPN. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.