Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Opentext functional Testing and Tricentis qTest 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Opentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingTricentis qTest
Star Rating
(100)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Tricentis qTestSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Tricentis qTest excels in test management, particularly highlighting its ability to reuse test cases. Users appreciate how easily they can rerun tests after deployments, which significantly saves time and enhances quality.
- Users say that Opentext functional Testing stands out for its speed during test execution. Reviewers have noted that its AI-powered capabilities allow for a wide range of automation, making it a robust choice for functional and regression testing.
- According to verified reviews, Tricentis qTest offers seamless integration with tools like Jira, providing real-time visibility into test execution and defects. This feature helps align QA and development teams effectively, which is a major plus for collaborative environments.
- Reviewers mention that while Opentext functional Testing is comprehensive, it may not be as user-friendly as Tricentis qTest. Some users have expressed that navigating its features can be less intuitive, which could impact day-to-day usability.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Tricentis qTest has a higher overall satisfaction score, reflecting its strong performance in areas like ease of use and test variety. Users find it easy to create and execute test cases, which contributes to a more efficient testing process.
- Users report that while both tools have solid support, Opentext functional Testing slightly edges out in quality of support. Reviewers appreciate the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, which can be crucial for resolving issues quickly.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Opentext functional Testing
No pricing availableTricentis qTest
No pricing availableFree Trial
Opentext functional Testing
No trial information availableTricentis qTest
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.7
40
8.4
72
Ease of Use
8.1
39
8.4
74
Ease of Setup
8.1
19
8.0
38
Ease of Admin
8.2
18
7.9
20
Quality of Support
8.5
38
8.4
70
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.4
16
8.2
21
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
37
9.1
80
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.6
27
Not enough data
8.0
29
Not enough data
8.5
28
Management
Not enough data
8.3
28
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
8.1
26
Functionality
8.1
8
9.1
15
7.9
8
9.0
16
8.1
8
8.5
16
8.3
8
9.2
15
Automation
8.1
8
9.1
15
7.7
8
9.0
15
8.1
8
8.8
15
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
7.9
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.0
10
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Opentext functional Testing and Tricentis qTest are categorized as Automation Testing and Software Testing
Unique Categories
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Tricentis qTest is categorized as Test Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Tricentis qTest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
27.1%
Computer Software
22.9%
Financial Services
7.3%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
5.2%
Hospital & Health Care
4.2%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Does qTest integrate with JIRA?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
qTest integrates with JIRA Cloud and JIRA Server, while also providing qTest Cloud or Server deployment options.
See this video here:...Read more
On-Boarding, Training, and continued support is a must have for any tool we adopt. How does QASymphony fit into our success?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
Keeping our customers happy is a top priority, and it shows. We consistently get top satisfaction scores across the board.
Check out our customer info...Read more
What is frequency of updates/releases?
1 Comment
Official Response from Tricentis qTest
At QASymphony, we are releasing new features and product improvements throughout the year. Right now we are targeting to release between 8 - 10 times a...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
