Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Mathematica and Modelica 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (52.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Mathematica
Star Rating
(86)4.1 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (45.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MathematicaModelica
Star Rating
(21)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (52.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ModelicaSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Mathematica excels in 3D/solid modeling tools with a rating of 8.5, while Modelica's capabilities in this area are not as strong, leading to a more limited experience for users needing advanced modeling features.
- Reviewers mention that Mathematica's editing tools are rated at 8.7, providing a more robust experience compared to Modelica's 8.1 rating, which some users find lacking in flexibility and functionality.
- G2 users highlight that Modelica shines in fluid analysis with a score of 8.9, slightly outperforming Mathematica's 8.8, indicating that users looking for fluid dynamics simulations may prefer Modelica for its specialized tools.
- Users on G2 report that Mathematica offers superior manufacturing process simulation with a remarkable score of 9.4, which reviewers say is a significant advantage for users in industrial applications compared to Modelica.
- Reviewers mention that while both products have similar ratings for discrete event modeling (8.5), Modelica's continuous event modeling is rated slightly lower at 8.0, suggesting that Mathematica may provide a more comprehensive solution for users needing continuous simulations.
- Users say that Mathematica's command clarity is rated at 8.6, which reviewers find easier to navigate compared to Modelica's 8.9, indicating that Mathematica may offer a more user-friendly experience for those new to the software.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Mathematica
No pricing availableModelica
No pricing availableFree Trial
Mathematica
No trial information availableModelica
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
78
8.5
12
Ease of Use
7.3
80
8.2
12
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.9
76
7.6
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.1
79
7.9
11
Features by Category
Design
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.1
9
8.6
7
8.7
10
8.1
7
8.8
8
Not enough data
Tools
8.8
8
8.9
6
8.1
8
6.3
5
7.9
8
8.1
6
Work
8.5
12
8.5
9
8.2
12
8.0
10
8.3
11
8.6
7
9.4
9
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
Environment
8.2
10
8.3
5
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.6
12
8.9
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Mathematica and Modelica are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Mathematica has no unique categories
Modelica has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Mathematica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Modelica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Research
17.4%
Information Technology and Services
9.3%
Higher Education
8.1%
Computer Software
7.0%
Automotive
7.0%
Other
51.2%
Automotive
21.1%
Renewables & Environment
15.8%
Research
10.5%
Higher Education
10.5%
Oil & Energy
5.3%
Other
36.8%
Discussions
Is Mathematica used in industry?
1 Comment
C
Yes Read more
Mathematica has no more discussions with answers
Modelica has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
