Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Maple and Posit 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ILUM
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Starburst
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Alteryx
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Enterprise (48.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Maple
Star Rating
(15)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MaplePosit
Star Rating
(562)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (48.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PositMaple vs Posit
- Reviewers felt that Posit meets the needs of their business better than Maple.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Maple is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Posit over Maple.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Maple
No pricing availablePosit
No pricing availableFree Trial
Maple
No trial information availablePosit
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
11
9.1
496
Ease of Use
8.0
11
8.3
496
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
8.8
106
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.3
90
Quality of Support
8.5
8
8.1
403
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.5
81
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
11
8.5
488
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
76
Not enough data
9.2
82
Not enough data
8.2
76
Capabilities
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.9
67
Not enough data
8.9
55
Not enough data
8.8
59
Methodology
Not enough data
9.1
77
Not enough data
9.5
85
Not enough data
9.3
82
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Work
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Environment
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
System
Not enough data
9.1
25
Model Development
Not enough data
8.8
19
Not enough data
7.8
21
Not enough data
8.3
21
Not enough data
9.0
21
Model Development
Not enough data
9.0
20
Machine/Deep Learning Services
Not enough data
8.6
15
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.7
13
Not enough data
7.6
17
Machine/Deep Learning Services
Not enough data
8.6
17
Not enough data
9.1
18
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
19
Not enough data
8.9
18
Not enough data
8.7
19
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Integrations
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.3
6
Platform
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.3
6
Processing
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.1
8
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Maple and Posit share no categories
Unique Categories
Maple is categorized as Simulation & CAE
Posit is categorized as Statistical Analysis, Big Data Processing and Distribution, and Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Maple
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Posit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
28.6%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Research
7.1%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
7.1%
Other
28.6%
Higher Education
19.1%
Information Technology and Services
12.6%
Research
11.2%
Computer Software
8.7%
Education Management
5.6%
Other
42.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Maple has no discussions with answers
Can we save our process if we don't save a project?
2 Comments
SL
There are many ways to save results as an R script runs, take a look at the R saveRDS function as one example.
For questions like this about R a great...Read more
What is the best way to run R code within a VBA routine?
1 Comment
PB
I ran into same kind of problems. Then I discovered PowerBI.
With PowerBI, and the help of PowerQuery, I'm getting rid of all VbA engines to process...Read more
Which software is used for R programming?
1 Comment
SH
RStudio is the most popular IDE for running R programs and has a free license. The official R software environment is an open-source free software...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
