Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Jit and SonarQube 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free
Jit
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JitSonarQube
Star Rating
(125)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SonarQube Server excels in Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.0, providing thorough insights into code quality, while Jit also performs well in this area with a score of 9.0, but lacks some of the depth in analysis that SonarQube offers.
- Reviewers mention that Jit shines in Ease of Setup with a score of 9.4, making it a more user-friendly option for teams looking to get started quickly, whereas SonarQube Server has a lower score of 7.8, indicating a steeper learning curve.
- G2 users highlight that Jit has superior Quality of Support with a score of 9.6, often praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team, while SonarQube Server's support is rated lower at 8.0, suggesting room for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that SonarQube Server's API / Integrations score of 7.7 is a limitation, as it may not integrate as seamlessly with other tools compared to Jit's higher score of 8.5, which indicates better compatibility with various development environments.
- Reviewers mention that Jit provides better Remediation Suggestions with a score of 8.4, offering actionable insights that help developers address issues effectively, while SonarQube Server's score of 8.2 indicates it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
- Users say that Jit’s False Positives score of 8.3 is a significant advantage, as it minimizes unnecessary alerts, whereas SonarQube Server's lower score of 6.8 suggests that users may encounter more false alarms, potentially leading to alert fatigue.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Jit
No pricing availableSonarQube
Community Edition
Free
Explore: https://www.sonarsource.com/plans-and-pricing/
- Free
- Popular & classic languages support
- Integration with DevOps platforms
Free Trial
Jit
No trial information availableSonarQube
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.9
42
8.8
108
Ease of Use
9.0
42
8.5
111
Ease of Setup
9.2
37
8.1
70
Ease of Admin
9.1
27
8.5
63
Quality of Support
9.3
42
8.2
91
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.6
26
8.4
57
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
43
8.6
105
Features by Category
Administration
8.1
22
7.8
19
8.0
22
6.0
20
Analysis
8.1
26
7.4
21
8.1
25
8.0
20
8.9
25
8.9
22
9.0
20
9.0
22
Testing
6.6
20
6.6
18
6.9
20
5.9
19
8.7
20
6.0
21
8.3
20
6.9
18
8.2
17
6.8
17
8.9
19
8.2
21
7.4
18
6.9
21
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
17
Not enough data
8.8
16
Not enough data
Analysis
8.6
16
Not enough data
8.9
15
Not enough data
9.2
16
Not enough data
9.4
16
Not enough data
9.2
14
Not enough data
Testing
7.5
14
Not enough data
8.5
14
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
9.0
14
Not enough data
7.3
14
Not enough data
Performance
8.3
21
Not enough data
8.4
21
Not enough data
7.6
21
Not enough data
8.6
22
Not enough data
Network
8.0
21
Not enough data
7.1
21
Not enough data
8.4
22
Not enough data
Application
7.0
21
Not enough data
8.6
24
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
31
Not enough data
8.4
30
Not enough data
8.2
29
Management
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
7.5
25
Not enough data
7.8
27
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.0
10
Not enough data
8.3
10
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
7.8
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
8.5
10
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.9
6
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
Responses
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
8.6
23
7.7
35
8.3
23
7.6
35
8.5
24
8.2
36
Security
7.9
25
6.9
33
8.2
23
7.0
32
8.3
24
7.9
33
Security
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Tracking
8.6
11
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.8
12
Not enough data
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.5
14
9.3
5
8.5
14
8.7
5
8.2
15
9.0
5
8.1
14
8.9
6
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.7
15
7.8
6
8.7
15
8.6
6
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.1
15
7.8
6
8.6
15
Not enough data
7.8
16
8.3
5
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Compliance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Risk Management & Monitoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Lifecycle Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Access Control and Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration and Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Governance Tools
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
6.3
8
Not enough data
5.7
7
Not enough data
6.7
8
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Jit and SonarQube are categorized as Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Secure Code Review, Software Composition Analysis, and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
SonarQube is categorized as Software Development Analytics Tools, Static Code Analysis, Bug Tracking, Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), AI AppSec Assistants, and AI Governance Tools
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Jit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SonarQube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
30.2%
Financial Services
14.0%
Telecommunications
11.6%
Information Technology and Services
7.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.0%
Other
30.2%
Information Technology and Services
26.6%
Computer Software
21.8%
Financial Services
6.5%
Hospital & Health Care
3.2%
Computer & Network Security
3.2%
Other
38.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Jit has no discussions with answers
SonarQube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
