Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare IBM Cloud Functions and SAP Integration Suite 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cloudways
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Omatic Software
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (64.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (58.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
IBM Cloud Functions
Star Rating
(14)3.9 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (64.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM Cloud FunctionsSAP Integration Suite
Star Rating
(301)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (58.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SAP Integration SuiteSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that SAP Integration Suite excels in real-time integration capabilities, scoring 7.9, which is crucial for enterprises needing immediate data synchronization, while IBM Cloud Functions lacks this specific feature, making it less suitable for real-time applications.
- Reviewers mention that SAP Integration Suite offers a robust API Designer and Flow Designer, which simplifies the process of creating and managing APIs, whereas IBM Cloud Functions does not provide a dedicated API construction tool, leading to a more cumbersome experience for developers.
- G2 users highlight that SAP Integration Suite's pre-built connectors and reusable connectors significantly reduce development time, with a score of 8.4 for development tools, while IBM Cloud Functions, with a score of 8.3, lacks the same level of pre-built integration options, which can slow down deployment.
- Users on G2 indicate that SAP Integration Suite's data security features, including data encryption and compliance with regulations, score an impressive 8.6, providing peace of mind for enterprises, while IBM Cloud Functions, with a lower score of 8.1, may not meet the same stringent security requirements.
- Reviewers say that SAP Integration Suite's application deployment score of 8.7 reflects its user-friendly interface and efficient deployment processes, while IBM Cloud Functions, scoring 7.7, is perceived as less intuitive, potentially leading to longer deployment times.
- Users report that SAP Integration Suite's analytics capabilities, scoring 8.6, provide valuable insights into application performance, whereas IBM Cloud Functions, with a score of 8.3, offers less comprehensive analytics, which may hinder data-driven decision-making.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
IBM Cloud Functions
No pricing availableSAP Integration Suite
No pricing availableFree Trial
IBM Cloud Functions
No trial information availableSAP Integration Suite
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.9
12
8.5
131
Ease of Use
8.1
13
8.2
142
Ease of Setup
8.0
5
8.1
115
Ease of Admin
8.7
5
7.9
95
Quality of Support
7.9
13
8.0
134
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
5
8.3
95
Product Direction (% positive)
6.8
11
8.9
123
Features by Category
Development
Not enough data
7.8
26
Not enough data
7.0
22
Not enough data
7.6
22
Not enough data
7.8
22
Not enough data
6.7
22
Not enough data
7.2
22
Not enough data
7.4
22
Management
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Not enough data
7.7
21
Not enough data
7.9
21
Not enough data
7.5
21
Security
Not enough data
7.1
21
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
6.9
20
Integration Options
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.5
20
Not enough data
7.5
19
Not enough data
7.1
18
Deployment
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
7.8
20
Development
7.7
8
8.7
54
8.3
8
8.3
54
8.1
9
8.4
54
8.5
9
8.2
53
8.5
9
8.1
53
Database
8.3
9
8.6
53
8.3
9
8.4
52
8.7
9
8.2
52
8.0
9
8.3
53
8.7
9
8.2
54
Infrastructure
7.8
9
8.2
48
8.9
9
8.4
47
8.1
8
8.7
52
API Construction
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
41
Not enough data
8.2
41
Not enough data
8.5
42
API Management
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
43
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.1
40
Not enough data
8.6
44
Data Integration
Not enough data
8.7
49
Not enough data
8.5
49
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
IBM Cloud Functions and SAP Integration Suite are categorized as Cloud Platform as a Service (PaaS)
Unique Categories
IBM Cloud Functions has no unique categories
SAP Integration Suite is categorized as iPaaS and API Management
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
IBM Cloud Functions
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SAP Integration Suite
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
21.4%
Insurance
14.3%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Hospital & Health Care
14.3%
Retail
7.1%
Other
28.6%
Information Technology and Services
17.3%
Computer Software
6.6%
Oil & Energy
4.6%
Chemicals
4.6%
Consumer Goods
4.1%
Other
62.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
IBM Cloud Functions has no discussions with answers
What is SAP Integration Suite used for?
1 Comment
VS
SAP Integration Suite is used to connect and integrate different applications, systems, and data sources—both SAP and non-SAP—across on-premise and cloud...Read more
SAP Integration Suite has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
