Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HyperSQL and Oracle Database 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
ER/Studio
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (61.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
HyperSQL
Star Rating
(22)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (55.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HyperSQLOracle Database
Star Rating
(988)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Oracle DatabaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Oracle Database excels in data schema management with a score of 8.9, while HyperSQL falls short with a score of 7.3, indicating that Oracle provides a more robust structure for complex data relationships.
- Reviewers mention that Oracle Database's query language capabilities are superior, scoring 8.9 compared to HyperSQL's 7.7, which suggests that users find Oracle's SQL features more powerful and versatile for their needs.
- G2 users highlight Oracle's strong performance in security features, achieving a score of 9.0, while HyperSQL only scores 7.2, indicating that Oracle offers more comprehensive security measures, including advanced encryption and access control.
- Users on G2 report that Oracle Database's scalability is a significant advantage, scoring 8.9, compared to HyperSQL's 7.4, making Oracle a better choice for enterprises expecting growth and increased data loads.
- Reviewers say that Oracle Database provides better disaster recovery options with a score of 8.5, while HyperSQL's lower score suggests it may not meet the same level of reliability in critical situations.
- Users say that Oracle's data replication features are more advanced, scoring 8.8, compared to HyperSQL's 7.6, which indicates that Oracle offers more effective solutions for maintaining data consistency across multiple locations.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
HyperSQL
No pricing availableOracle Database
No pricing availableFree Trial
HyperSQL
No trial information availableOracle Database
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
7.3
18
9.0
710
Ease of Use
8.7
18
8.3
716
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.6
373
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.8
327
Quality of Support
8.0
17
8.3
680
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.1
329
Product Direction (% positive)
5.5
18
8.2
679
Features by Category
Management
Not enough data
9.0
143
Not enough data
8.9
145
Not enough data
8.9
128
Not enough data
8.8
138
Support
Not enough data
8.4
140
Not enough data
8.9
143
Not enough data
8.7
141
Not enough data
8.8
139
Security
Not enough data
8.8
141
Not enough data
8.8
143
Not enough data
8.7
136
Not enough data
8.8
142
Performance
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.8
137
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
8.8
140
Not enough data
8.8
144
Database Features
7.3
16
9.0
494
8.5
16
9.0
496
7.4
16
8.9
501
7.4
15
8.7
493
7.2
15
9.0
493
7.6
16
8.8
486
7.7
16
8.9
495
Configuration
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.3
87
Not enough data
8.6
89
Not enough data
8.4
84
Not enough data
8.9
88
Database Administration
Not enough data
8.5
85
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
8.9
85
Availability
Not enough data
8.9
87
Not enough data
9.0
89
Not enough data
8.8
83
Not enough data
8.7
84
Security
Not enough data
8.8
86
Not enough data
8.6
83
Not enough data
8.7
80
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
81
Not enough data
8.7
80
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HyperSQL and Oracle Database are categorized as Relational Databases
Unique Categories
HyperSQL has no unique categories
Oracle Database is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HyperSQL
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Oracle Database
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
50.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.0%
Higher Education
10.0%
Wireless
5.0%
Internet
5.0%
Other
10.0%
Information Technology and Services
20.6%
Computer Software
11.5%
Financial Services
5.6%
Banking
5.1%
Hospital & Health Care
4.3%
Other
52.9%
Alternatives
Discussions
HyperSQL has no discussions with answers
What is Oracle Database used for?
2 Comments
AA
Oracle Database is a relational database management system (RDBMS) that is widely used in the industry for managing and storing large volumes of data. It...Read more
What is the solution for extracting pdf data stored in DB in clob format
1 Comment
WG
try APEXRead more
Why oracles was not up the mark in mobile arena.
1 Comment
WG
All Oracle products have mobile versions.
For development, try APEX.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
