Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare HP-UX and Red Hat Enterprise Linux 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Sangfor HCI
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Triton DataCenter
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.4% of reviews)
Enterprise (51.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
HP-UX
Star Rating
(29)3.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (41.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about HP-UXRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Star Rating
(937)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about Red Hat Enterprise LinuxSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Red Hat Enterprise Linux excels in Ease of Setup with a score of 8.5, while HP-UX falls short at 6.9, making RHEL a more user-friendly option for new installations.
- Reviewers mention that Red Hat's Quality of Support is rated at 8.8, significantly higher than HP-UX's 7.8, indicating that users find RHEL's support team more responsive and helpful.
- G2 users highlight Red Hat's superior Performance Management with a score of 9.0, compared to HP-UX's lower performance metrics, suggesting that RHEL provides better tools for monitoring and optimizing system performance.
- Users on G2 emphasize the importance of Automatic Security Updates, where Red Hat shines with a score of 8.9, while HP-UX's security update features are less robust, scoring only 7.8, indicating a potential vulnerability for HP-UX users.
- Reviewers say that Red Hat's Scalability is rated at 8.6, making it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to grow, whereas HP-UX's scalability features are rated lower, which may limit its effectiveness in larger environments.
- Users report that Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers better Application Support with a score of 8.5, while HP-UX's application compatibility is less favorable, suggesting that RHEL is more versatile for diverse software environments.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
HP-UX
No pricing availableRed Hat Enterprise Linux
No pricing availableFree Trial
HP-UX
No trial information availableRed Hat Enterprise Linux
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
7.9
25
9.1
485
Ease of Use
7.6
25
8.4
751
Ease of Setup
7.0
17
8.5
558
Ease of Admin
7.8
16
8.5
289
Quality of Support
7.7
25
8.8
469
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.7
18
8.9
276
Product Direction (% positive)
6.3
25
8.9
465
Features by Category
Performance
Not enough data
8.6
40
Not enough data
8.7
38
Not enough data
8.6
37
Functionality
Not enough data
8.8
38
Not enough data
8.5
38
Not enough data
8.9
38
Not enough data
9.0
38
Agentic AI - Server Virtualization
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
8.3
5
Application Support
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.7
21
Not enough data
8.5
21
System Capability
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Security
Not enough data
9.0
19
Not enough data
9.3
21
Memory Management - Operating System
Not enough data
8.7
17
Device Management - Operating System
Not enough data
8.5
17
Backup and Recovery - Operating System
Not enough data
7.3
16
Error Detection - Operating System
Not enough data
7.8
18
Security
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.1
7
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
HP-UX and Red Hat Enterprise Linux are categorized as Server Virtualization
Unique Categories
HP-UX has no unique categories
Red Hat Enterprise Linux is categorized as Operating System, IoT Operating Systems, and Container Engine
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
HP-UX
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
20.7%
Computer Software
20.7%
Telecommunications
6.9%
Information Services
6.9%
Financial Services
6.9%
Other
37.9%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Computer Software
11.3%
Telecommunications
6.4%
Financial Services
5.8%
Computer & Network Security
5.0%
Other
51.4%
Discussions
What is HP-UX used for?
1 Comment
MS
its a OS and we are using for SAP.Read more
HP-UX has no more discussions with answers
What in RHEL you guys love?
3 Comments
LL
Guys, if you are looking for love you need to try Ladadate dating site. This is a great solution for all single people. I also want to share with you a cool...Read more
How to use RedHat Containers for Virtualization?
1 Comment
GS
If container-native virtualization is enabled for let’s say an open shift cluster, you can create and add virtualized applications from the service catalog...Read more
What is the b st way to implement web based tools in rhel without gui
1 Comment
MM
yum installRead more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
