Compare GitLab and OpenText Static Application Security Testing 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
GitLab
Star Rating
(875)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLabOpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that GitLab excels in providing an integrated platform for development, combining source control, CI pipelines, security scanning, and deployment automation. Users appreciate that it reduces the need for multiple tools, making daily development smoother and less mentally taxing.
- Users say that OpenText Static Application Security Testing offers extensive support for a wide range of programming languages, which is a significant advantage for teams working with diverse tech stacks. Its ability to generate FPR files from CI/CD pipelines is also highlighted as a valuable feature.
- Reviewers mention that GitLab's user interface is intuitive, making tasks like code searching and managing pipelines straightforward. This ease of use is a key factor in its higher overall satisfaction ratings compared to OpenText, which, while also rated well, does not have the same level of user-friendly feedback.
- According to verified reviews, GitLab's implementation process is praised for its quick setup, with users noting that the built-in CI/CD functionality works out of the box, allowing for rapid deployment. In contrast, OpenText users have not provided recent feedback on setup, which may indicate a lack of recent user engagement.
- G2 reviewers highlight that GitLab's strong API and integration capabilities enhance its extensibility, allowing teams to customize their workflows effectively. OpenText also offers integration capabilities, but GitLab's higher ratings in this area suggest a more seamless experience for users.
- Users report that while both products have solid support, GitLab's overall support quality is slightly lower than OpenText's, which has received positive feedback for its responsiveness. However, GitLab's comprehensive feature set and user satisfaction still make it a preferred choice for many.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing availableOpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
663
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.7
666
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.6
226
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.6
172
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.5
527
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
147
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
630
9.1
13
Features by Category
Administration
8.7
124
Not enough data
8.9
131
Not enough data
8.6
123
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
130
Not enough data
8.5
115
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
133
Not enough data
9.0
122
Not enough data
8.7
122
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
30
8.9
9
9.0
28
8.7
10
Analysis
8.7
26
8.3
11
9.0
28
8.0
11
9.1
27
8.8
11
8.8
26
8.5
10
Testing
8.8
28
8.1
9
8.7
26
6.9
9
9.1
27
8.7
10
8.8
26
8.5
8
8.8
24
7.0
9
8.5
24
8.3
9
8.8
24
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
25
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
Analysis
8.5
24
Not enough data
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
24
Not enough data
8.9
24
Not enough data
9.0
24
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.9
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
9.1
21
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
78
Not enough data
8.7
75
Not enough data
8.8
81
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
79
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
9.0
79
Not enough data
8.7
73
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.9
74
Not enough data
8.6
71
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
215
Not enough data
9.0
218
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.8
203
Not enough data
8.4
193
Not enough data
8.9
211
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
139
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
8.6
140
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
136
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
135
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
65
Not enough data
8.8
71
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
64
Not enough data
9.0
64
Not enough data
9.0
61
Not enough data
Management
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
148
Not enough data
8.5
136
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
153
Not enough data
8.8
151
Not enough data
8.6
141
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
157
Not enough data
8.5
141
Not enough data
9.0
158
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
226
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
204
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.9
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
215
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
198
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.3
11
Not enough data
7.8
13
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
7.1
11
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
117
Not enough data
8.6
112
Not enough data
8.4
112
Not enough data
Security
8.0
101
Not enough data
8.4
101
Not enough data
9.0
110
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
39
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.9
37
Not enough data
Value Management
9.0
39
Not enough data
8.7
41
Not enough data
8.9
40
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
GitLab is categorized as Secure Code Review, DevOps Platforms, Value Stream Management, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Application Release Orchestration, Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Continuous Delivery, Bug Tracking, Continuous Integration, and AI Code Generation
OpenText Static Application Security Testing is categorized as Static Code Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
33.3%
Information Technology and Services
24.2%
Internet
4.0%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.7%
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
