Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now

Compare GitLab and OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Save
    Log in to your account
    to save comparisons,
    products and more.
At a Glance
GitLab
GitLab
Star Rating
(860)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (37.3% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about GitLab
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Information
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security Testing
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
  • Users report that GitLab excels in its Pipeline Control feature, achieving a score of 9.1, which allows for seamless management of CI/CD processes, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer scores lower at 8.5 in Workflow Visualization, indicating a less intuitive experience for users managing workflows.
  • Reviewers mention that GitLab's Test Automation capabilities are highly rated at 9.0, providing robust support for automated testing, whereas OpenText Fortify's Test Automation feature scores 8.5, suggesting it may not be as comprehensive in this area.
  • G2 users highlight GitLab's superior Static Code Analysis with a score of 9.1, which is crucial for identifying vulnerabilities early in the development process, compared to OpenText Fortify's score of 8.7, indicating a potential gap in effectiveness for users focused on security.
  • Users on G2 report that GitLab's Integration capabilities are rated at 8.9, making it easier to connect with various tools and services, while OpenText Fortify's integration score is slightly lower at 8.6, which may limit flexibility for teams using diverse tech stacks.
  • Reviewers say that GitLab's Access Control feature is rated 8.9, providing robust security measures for managing user permissions, whereas OpenText Fortify's score of 8.4 suggests it may not offer the same level of granularity in user management.
  • Users report that GitLab's Documentation is well-received, with a score of 8.8, indicating comprehensive resources for users, while OpenText Fortify's documentation is rated lower at 8.3, which could hinder user onboarding and troubleshooting.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitLab
No pricing available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing available
Free Trial
GitLab
Free Trial is available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.1
650
8.3
15
Ease of Use
8.7
652
8.7
15
Ease of Setup
8.6
213
8.3
9
Ease of Admin
8.6
170
8.1
9
Quality of Support
8.5
514
8.7
15
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
145
8.5
9
Product Direction (% positive)
8.7
617
9.1
13
Features by Category
Application Release OrchestrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.7
142
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
122
Not enough data
8.9
130
Not enough data
8.6
122
Not enough data
Functionality
9.0
128
Not enough data
8.5
114
Not enough data
8.5
109
Not enough data
8.7
114
Not enough data
8.6
103
Not enough data
Processes
9.1
131
Not enough data
9.0
120
Not enough data
8.7
120
Not enough data
Static Application Security Testing (SAST)Hide 14 FeaturesShow 14 Features
8.8
30
8.1
13
Administration
9.1
27
8.9
9
9.0
26
8.7
10
Analysis
8.6
25
8.3
11
8.9
26
8.0
11
9.1
26
8.8
11
8.8
24
8.5
10
Testing
8.8
26
8.1
9
8.7
25
6.9
9
9.1
25
8.7
10
8.8
25
8.5
8
8.8
23
7.0
9
8.4
23
8.3
9
8.7
23
6.2
11
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)Hide 13 FeaturesShow 13 Features
8.9
26
Not enough data
Administration
9.2
24
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
Analysis
8.4
23
Not enough data
9.1
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.8
23
Not enough data
8.9
23
Not enough data
Testing
8.6
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
8.9
21
Not enough data
9.0
20
Not enough data
8.9
19
Not enough data
9.1
20
Not enough data
Cloud Infrastructure AutomationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.7
89
Not enough data
Administration
8.7
76
Not enough data
8.7
77
Not enough data
8.7
74
Not enough data
8.8
79
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
78
Not enough data
8.4
71
Not enough data
9.0
78
Not enough data
8.6
72
Not enough data
IT Management
8.7
73
Not enough data
8.8
73
Not enough data
8.6
70
Not enough data
8.3
231
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
210
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.7
197
Not enough data
8.3
190
Not enough data
8.9
204
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.5
10
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
8.5
163
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.6
138
Not enough data
8.5
132
Not enough data
8.6
139
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.4
135
Not enough data
8.8
144
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
8.3
9
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Not enough data
Software Composition AnalysisHide 6 FeaturesShow 6 Features
8.9
74
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.7
64
Not enough data
8.8
69
Not enough data
8.7
66
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
63
Not enough data
8.9
63
Not enough data
8.9
60
Not enough data
8.8
162
Not enough data
Management
8.7
140
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.5
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.8
145
Not enough data
8.7
137
Not enough data
Processes
9.0
149
Not enough data
8.5
138
Not enough data
9.0
152
Not enough data
Continuous IntegrationHide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
8.1
238
Not enough data
Functionality
8.9
223
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
208
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
202
|
Verified
Not enough data
Management
8.8
210
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
213
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
195
|
Verified
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
7.0
10
Not enough data
7.4
12
Not enough data
7.6
11
Not enough data
7.3
10
Not enough data
7.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
130
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
114
Not enough data
8.6
110
Not enough data
8.3
110
Not enough data
Security
8.0
99
Not enough data
8.4
98
Not enough data
8.9
107
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Code Generation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Static Code AnalysisHide 3 FeaturesShow 3 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Value Stream ManagementHide 7 FeaturesShow 7 Features
8.8
47
Not enough data
Value Analysis
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.6
36
Not enough data
8.8
36
Not enough data
Value Management
8.9
38
Not enough data
8.7
40
Not enough data
8.8
39
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitLab
GitLab
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
GitLab and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are categorized as Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitLab
GitLab
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
37.3%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
36.2%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
26.5%
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
28.6%
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
23.8%
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
47.6%
Reviewers' Industry
GitLab
GitLab
Computer Software
33.5%
Information Technology and Services
24.1%
Internet
3.9%
Financial Services
3.4%
Telecommunications
2.3%
Other
32.8%
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Alternatives
GitLab
GitLab Alternatives
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
CloudBees
CloudBees
Add CloudBees
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Add Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Harness Platform
Harness Platform
Add Harness Platform
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing Alternatives
SonarQube
SonarQube
Add SonarQube
Coverity
Coverity
Add Coverity
Checkmarx
Checkmarx
Add Checkmarx
GitHub
GitHub
Add GitHub
Discussions
GitLab
GitLab Discussions
Is GitLab paid?
5 Comments
Pankaj G.
PG
Yes, Gitlab is paid as it provides the flexibility to use all the features of the GitHub and Git as well as the freedom to use your own DataBase so that you...Read more
Is GitLab free software?
4 Comments
Roke B.
RB
Yes, in that for non-commercial users, payment is unnecessary. Additionally, its source is publicly available.Read more
Why does GitLab Server goes down?
2 Comments
Roke B.
RB
That is different for each outage.Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing Discussions
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
Sandra H.
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
Vis C.
VC
Fortify SSC server Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
Monty the Mongoose crying
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers