Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ExaVault and Progress WS_FTP 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cerberus FTP Server
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
SFTP To Go
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Couchdrop
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$99.00 50 Users Per Month
No pricing available
ExaVault
Star Rating
(194)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$99.00 50 Users Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 3 pricing plansProgress WS_FTP
Star Rating
(16)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (43.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Progress WS_FTPSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Progress WS_FTP excels in its Application Integration with a score of 9.4, allowing seamless connectivity with various applications, while ExaVault FTP also performs well but is noted for its Ease of Setup with a score of 9.5, making it more user-friendly for new users.
- Reviewers mention that ExaVault FTP shines in Quality of Support with a score of 9.0, providing responsive customer service, whereas Progress WS_FTP has a lower score of 7.8, indicating potential delays in support response times.
- G2 users highlight that Progress WS_FTP offers robust File Transfer capabilities with a score of 9.3, but ExaVault FTP is praised for its File Backup features, scoring 8.8, which some users find essential for data security.
- Users on G2 report that ExaVault FTP has a superior Mobile Support score of 8.7, making it easier to manage file transfers on the go, while Progress WS_FTP's mobile capabilities are less emphasized in user reviews.
- Reviewers mention that both products have strong Encryption features, but Progress WS_FTP scores slightly lower at 9.3 compared to ExaVault FTP's 9.4, indicating a slight edge in security for ExaVault FTP.
- Users say that while both products have good Access Control features, ExaVault FTP's score of 9.2 is noted for being more intuitive and user-friendly, compared to Progress WS_FTP's similar score, which some users find less straightforward.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ExaVault
Paid Service
$99.00
50 Users Per Month
- All Features from Free Plan
- Automated Updates
- SSO Support
Progress WS_FTP
No pricing availableFree Trial
ExaVault
Free Trial is available
Progress WS_FTP
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
136
9.4
12
Ease of Use
9.5
137
9.3
12
Ease of Setup
9.5
116
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.4
115
Not enough data
Quality of Support
9.0
115
7.8
6
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.2
112
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.7
120
4.7
11
Features by Category
Data Delivery
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Functionality
8.7
5
|
Verified
Not enough data
9.0
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
13
|
Verified
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Governance
8.7
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
Core Transfer Infrastructure - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Capabilities - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
9.0
17
|
Verified
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security & Compliance Controls - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
8.7
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
21
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
22
|
Verified
Not enough data
Intelligent Automation & AI - Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
9.3
70
Not enough data
8.8
47
Not enough data
8.6
33
Not enough data
8.9
67
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
81
Not enough data
8.3
14
Not enough data
8.8
42
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Security
9.3
58
Not enough data
9.3
67
Not enough data
9.2
71
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ExaVault and Progress WS_FTP are categorized as File Transfer Protocol (FTP)
Unique Categories
ExaVault is categorized as Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Progress WS_FTP has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ExaVault
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Progress WS_FTP
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
12.0%
Information Technology and Services
5.8%
Marketing and Advertising
5.2%
Retail
4.7%
Automotive
3.7%
Other
68.6%
Insurance
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Entertainment
12.5%
Retail
6.3%
Photography
6.3%
Other
50.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
What are the features of FTP?
1 Comment
DO
FTP (file transfer protocol) is used to move files and perform file related actions. It is a solid protocol supported by the majority of devices and...Read more
ExaVault has no more discussions with answers
Progress WS_FTP has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
