Compare ERDAS IMAGINE vs GRASS

See this
comparison of ERDAS IMAGINE vs. GRASS
based on data from user reviews. ERDAS IMAGINE rates 4.3/5 stars with 12 reviews. GRASS rates 4.2/5 stars with 13 reviews. Each product's score is calculated by real-time data from verified user reviews.

Pricing

 
Free Trial Unavailable
Free Trial Unavailable
ERDAS IMAGINE
Free Trial Unavailable
GRASS
Free Trial Unavailable

Ratings

Meets Requirements
Meets Requirements
7.9
8.8
Ease of Use
Ease of Use
7.1
6.8
Ease of Setup
Ease of SetupNot enough data availableNot enough data available
Ease of Admin
Ease of AdminNot enough data availableNot enough data available
Quality of Support
Quality of Support
7.4
7.4
Ease of Doing Business With
Ease of Doing Business WithNot enough data availableNot enough data available
Product Direction (% positive)
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
9.0
Meets Requirements
ERDAS IMAGINE
7.9
GRASS
8.8
Ease of Use
ERDAS IMAGINE
7.1
GRASS
6.8
Ease of Setup
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
Not enough data available
Ease of Admin
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
Not enough data available
Quality of Support
ERDAS IMAGINE
7.4
GRASS
7.4
Ease of Doing Business With
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
Not enough data available
Product Direction (% positive)
ERDAS IMAGINE
7.1
GRASS
9.0

Features

Data Management
Data Capture
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
8.3
Data Storage
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.6
Data Manipulation
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
8.3
Data Visualization
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.4
Map Creation
Geocoding
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.6
Buffer Zone Query
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.5
Overlaying
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.9
Publishing
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.1
Analysis
Spatial Analysis
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
8.3
Reporting
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
8.1
Real-Time Streaming
ERDAS IMAGINE
Not enough data available
GRASS
7.7

Reviewers' Company Size

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
16.7%
38.5%
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
41.7%
46.2%
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
41.7%
15.4%
ERDAS IMAGINE
Small-Business
16.7%
Mid-Market
41.7%
Enterprise
41.7%
GRASS
Small-Business
38.5%
Mid-Market
46.2%
Enterprise
15.4%

Reviewers' Industry

 
Research
16.7%
Environmental Services
30.8%
 
Higher Education
16.7%
Construction
15.4%
 
Environmental Services
16.7%
Research
7.7%
 
Utilities
8.3%
Political Organization
7.7%
 
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Oil & Energy
7.7%
 
Other
33.3%
Other
30.8%
ERDAS IMAGINE
Research
16.7%
Higher Education
16.7%
Environmental Services
16.7%
Utilities
8.3%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Other
33.3%
GRASS
Environmental Services
30.8%
Construction
15.4%
Research
7.7%
Political Organization
7.7%
Oil & Energy
7.7%
Other
30.8%

Reviews

Most Helpful Favorable Review
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Scott F.
User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

The change to ribbon format was good and the workflows for processing large mosaic datasets or sub setting are fantastic. Image reclassifications are also intuitive. My favorite has always been the easy of doing manual image rectifications.

Sean G.
User in Political Organization

I've used Grass on it's own in the past, however I really enjoy the fact that it is available within QGIS within a plugin. This makes using the best features of GRASS easily accessible.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Most Helpful Critical Review
User in Non-Profit Organization Management

Time consuming to set up the semi-automated analysis.

Nikhil G.
Industry Analyst / Tech Writer in Higher Education

There are many website which support such operation like earthexplorer.usgs.gov which do the same. Functions to apply are not simple as ArcGIS

 
ERDAS IMAGINE
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Scott F.
User in Transportation/Trucking/Railroad

The change to ribbon format was good and the workflows for processing large mosaic datasets or sub setting are fantastic. Image reclassifications are also intuitive. My favorite has always been the easy of doing manual image rectifications.

Most Helpful Critical Review
User in Non-Profit Organization Management

Time consuming to set up the semi-automated analysis.

GRASS
Most Helpful Favorable Review
Sean G.
User in Political Organization

I've used Grass on it's own in the past, however I really enjoy the fact that it is available within QGIS within a plugin. This makes using the best features of GRASS easily accessible.

Most Helpful Critical Review
Nikhil G.
Industry Analyst / Tech Writer in Higher Education

There are many website which support such operation like earthexplorer.usgs.gov which do the same. Functions to apply are not simple as ArcGIS

Screenshots

 
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
Ask ERDAS IMAGINE a QuestionContact ERDAS IMAGINERequest More InformationRequest More Information