Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Designcenter Solid Edge and OpenFOAM 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $90.47 Per Month
No pricing available
Designcenter Solid Edge
Star Rating
(549)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $90.47 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansOpenFOAM
Star Rating
(35)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenFOAMSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Solid Edge excels in ease of use with a score of 8.5, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for a user-friendly interface, while OpenFOAM's score of 6.7 indicates a steeper learning curve that may require more training.
- Reviewers mention that Solid Edge's CAD-CAM compatibility is rated at 8.4, which facilitates smoother workflows between design and manufacturing, whereas OpenFOAM lacks in this area, making it less suitable for integrated CAD/CAM processes.
- G2 users highlight Solid Edge's strong performance in 3D/solid modeling tools with a score of 9.5, which is particularly beneficial for detailed mechanical designs, while OpenFOAM's score of 6.2 suggests limitations in this aspect, potentially hindering complex modeling tasks.
- Users on G2 report that Solid Edge's quality of support is rated at 8.4, indicating a reliable support system for troubleshooting and guidance, in contrast to OpenFOAM's lower score of 6.1, which may lead to challenges in getting timely assistance.
- Reviewers say that Solid Edge's file interoperability is rated at 9.0, allowing for seamless integration with various file formats, while OpenFOAM's capabilities in this area are less robust, which could complicate collaboration with other software tools.
- Users report that Solid Edge offers superior customization options, with custom commands and menus rated at 8.8 and 9.0 respectively, enabling users to tailor their experience, whereas OpenFOAM's customization features are not as extensive, limiting user flexibility.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Designcenter Solid Edge
Solid Edge Design and Drafting XaaS
Starting at $90.47
Per Month
Get started quickly with part & assembly design, automated drawings, basic animation and rendering.
- 2D drafting
- Data import and reuse
- Basic 3D part design
OpenFOAM
No pricing availableFree Trial
Designcenter Solid Edge
Free Trial is available
OpenFOAM
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
403
8.0
26
Ease of Use
8.3
442
6.7
26
Ease of Setup
8.2
227
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.4
86
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.2
374
6.1
21
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.8
85
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.3
391
6.1
24
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
8.6
98
Not enough data
8.4
93
Not enough data
8.4
94
Not enough data
CNC Programming
7.9
83
Not enough data
8.0
82
Not enough data
8.1
81
Not enough data
Machining
8.1
91
Not enough data
8.1
92
Not enough data
8.4
91
Not enough data
Design
8.9
172
Not enough data
8.9
173
Not enough data
8.7
171
Not enough data
8.2
166
Not enough data
Edit
8.5
169
Not enough data
8.3
161
Not enough data
8.5
169
Not enough data
8.4
162
Not enough data
Collaboration
8.5
164
Not enough data
8.6
166
Not enough data
8.2
165
Not enough data
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
8.7
83
Not enough data
8.2
66
Not enough data
8.2
74
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
7.7
73
Not enough data
8.5
78
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
7.6
64
Not enough data
8.6
80
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
72
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
5.9
25
Not enough data
6.0
26
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
8.6
95
6.2
11
8.6
96
6.1
11
8.5
94
6.8
11
7.9
94
7.1
12
Tools
7.6
80
8.8
13
8.0
86
6.5
8
7.7
82
6.3
8
Work
7.8
83
6.7
8
7.7
83
6.9
9
7.8
83
7.1
8
7.7
77
6.4
7
8.0
82
6.9
9
Environment
8.1
89
7.1
8
8.0
90
6.8
10
7.9
85
7.4
7
8.5
91
7.2
12
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.4
92
Not enough data
7.6
90
Not enough data
8.3
90
Not enough data
8.2
90
Not enough data
7.4
88
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
8.0
91
Not enough data
8.1
90
Not enough data
7.7
88
Not enough data
7.3
88
Not enough data
7.4
89
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
7.8
86
Not enough data
7.4
86
Not enough data
7.6
88
Not enough data
7.5
88
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
7.7
89
Not enough data
7.9
88
Not enough data
7.6
88
Not enough data
8.0
88
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Designcenter Solid Edge and OpenFOAM are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Designcenter Solid Edge is categorized as Additive Manufacturing, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), and General-Purpose CAD
OpenFOAM has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Designcenter Solid Edge
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenFOAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
21.0%
Automotive
12.6%
Design
9.0%
Machinery
6.1%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
4.0%
Other
47.3%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
30.3%
Automotive
18.2%
Research
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Discussions
Is Solidworks or Solid Edge better?
4 Comments
HJ
Solidworks is far better in terms of productivity and user friendly mostly for repetitive models or library parts. Read more
How can solid edge be improved? Making it available for the higher version of the OS.
2 Comments
EK
Hello Mahalakshmi,
The most recent version, Solid Edge 2021, has been certified to run on the Windows 10 Enterprise or Professional (64-bit only) version...Read more
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
OpenFOAM has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
