Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and PingAccess 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
The Onapsis Platform
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Foxpass by Splashtop
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (80.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Star Rating
(68)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (71.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Access ManagerPingAccess
Star Rating
(26)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (80.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about PingAccessSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that CyberArk Privileged Access Manager excels in its "Password Vault" feature, receiving a high score of 9.7, which reviewers mention provides robust security for sensitive credentials. In contrast, PingAccess's password management capabilities scored lower at 8.7, indicating a less comprehensive solution.
- Reviewers mention that CyberArk's "Multi-Factor Authentication" feature is highly effective, scoring 9.2, which enhances security significantly. Meanwhile, PingAccess also offers strong multi-factor authentication but received a slightly lower score of 9.0, suggesting it may not be as robust in this area.
- Users on G2 highlight CyberArk's "Live session recording & playback" feature, which is not available in PingAccess, making it a standout for organizations that require detailed session audits and compliance tracking.
- G2 users report that CyberArk's "Audit Logging" and "Activity Logging" features both scored 9.2, indicating a strong capability for tracking user actions. PingAccess, while also effective, scored slightly lower at 8.9 and 9.1 respectively, suggesting that CyberArk may provide more comprehensive logging options.
- Reviewers mention that CyberArk's "Centralized Management" feature scored 9.0, which allows for streamlined administration across multiple users and roles. PingAccess, while also strong in this area with a score of 8.9, may not offer the same level of integration and ease of use as CyberArk.
- Users say that CyberArk's "Self-Service Access Requests" feature, scoring 8.2, is user-friendly but is outshined by PingAccess, which scored 9.1, indicating a more intuitive process for users requesting access to resources.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
No pricing availablePingAccess
No pricing availableFree Trial
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
No trial information availablePingAccess
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
54
9.2
21
Ease of Use
8.2
56
9.1
22
Ease of Setup
6.9
40
9.5
13
Ease of Admin
8.1
42
8.9
12
Quality of Support
8.2
50
9.3
20
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
38
8.5
10
Product Direction (% positive)
8.8
56
9.5
22
Features by Category
Administration
9.0
37
8.7
13
8.8
36
8.7
10
8.4
34
8.1
12
8.1
35
9.0
8
8.6
37
8.9
6
8.4
34
9.1
9
Functionality
9.2
38
9.0
16
9.1
35
9.2
15
8.3
30
7.8
6
9.7
37
8.7
14
9.0
36
8.9
6
9.1
36
8.5
13
8.2
33
8.6
11
9.3
35
Not enough data
9.7
36
9.1
9
9.1
35
8.5
13
Monitoring
9.3
37
8.9
9
9.2
37
9.1
9
8.1
35
Not enough data
Reporting
9.2
35
8.5
8
8.0
35
8.6
12
Agentic AI - SAP Store
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and PingAccess are categorized as Privileged Access Management (PAM)
Unique Categories
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is categorized as SAP Store and AWS Marketplace
PingAccess has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
PingAccess
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
14.5%
Banking
12.9%
Insurance
6.5%
Retail
4.8%
Financial Services
4.8%
Other
56.5%
Accounting
48.0%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
8.0%
Information Technology and Services
8.0%
Media Production
4.0%
Management Consulting
4.0%
Other
28.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager has no discussions with answers
What is PingAccess?
1 Comment
DB
PingAccess is a centralized access security solution with a comprehensive policy engine, providing secure access to applications and APIs down to the URL...Read more
PingAccess has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
