Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cucumber and OpenText Application Quality Management 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Kualitee
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Cucumber
Star Rating
(39)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CucumberOpenText Application Quality Management
Star Rating
(133)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (66.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Application Quality ManagementSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText ALM Quality Center excels in its Test Repository functionality, scoring a remarkable 9.1, which allows for comprehensive management of test cases and results, while Cucumber, although strong, does not provide the same level of centralized test management.
- Reviewers mention that OpenText ALM Quality Center's integration capabilities score 8.1, making it suitable for enterprise environments that require seamless connections with other tools, whereas Cucumber, while flexible, may not integrate as deeply with larger enterprise systems.
- G2 users highlight that OpenText ALM Quality Center offers superior Bug Reporting features, particularly in Tester Reports & Feedback, which scored 9.1, allowing teams to efficiently track and manage bugs, while Cucumber's reporting features, although effective, do not match this level of detail.
- Users on G2 indicate that OpenText ALM Quality Center shines in its Management capabilities, particularly in Reporting and Version Control, both scoring 8.9, which are crucial for maintaining oversight in large projects, whereas Cucumber's management features are more basic and may not meet the needs of larger teams.
- Reviewers mention that Cucumber stands out in its Automation capabilities, particularly with its procedural automated creation and testing features, which are highly praised for their ease of use and flexibility, making it a favorite among smaller teams and agile environments.
- Users say that OpenText ALM Quality Center's thoroughness in Test History, scoring 8.7, provides a robust audit trail for testing activities, which is essential for compliance in enterprise settings, while Cucumber's test history features are less comprehensive, potentially leaving gaps in documentation.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cucumber
No pricing availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cucumber
No trial information availableOpenText Application Quality Management
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
27
8.2
118
Ease of Use
8.1
27
7.9
118
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
7.2
61
Ease of Admin
7.6
7
7.2
59
Quality of Support
8.0
26
7.7
106
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.4
7
7.7
56
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
24
6.8
116
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
9.2
10
Not enough data
8.2
10
Not enough data
9.2
10
Management
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Not enough data
8.8
10
Bug Reporting
Not enough data
8.3
11
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.5
12
Bug Monitoring
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.6
11
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Automation
Not enough data
9.7
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Core Lifecycle Management - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Organization - ALM Software
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AWS Marketplace
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Communication
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Procedural
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cucumber and OpenText Application Quality Management are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
Cucumber has no unique categories
OpenText Application Quality Management is categorized as Test Management, Requirements Management, ALM Software, Bug Tracking, Automation Testing, and AWS Marketplace
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cucumber
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenText Application Quality Management
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Computer Software
17.6%
Retail
8.8%
Food & Beverages
5.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Other
32.4%
Information Technology and Services
36.8%
Computer Software
13.6%
Banking
6.4%
Hospital & Health Care
4.0%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
35.2%
Discussions
Cucumber has no discussions with answers
How compatible is this software in integrating it with non micro focus applications?
2 Comments
PK
This app originally named as Test director was developed by Mercury over 15 years ago. Then the it was renamed to Quality center and new owner became...Read more
OpenText Application Quality Management has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
