Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cosmos DB and Hazelcast Platform 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
RaimaDB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CockroachDB
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBHazelcast Platform
Star Rating
(13)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (50.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Hazelcast PlatformSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Hazelcast Platform excels in real-time data processing with its in-memory data grid capabilities, allowing for faster data access and lower latency compared to Azure Cosmos DB, which is noted for its robust multi-model database support.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Cosmos DB offers superior scalability and global distribution features, making it a preferred choice for enterprise-level applications, while Hazelcast Platform is often favored by small businesses for its ease of use and setup.
- G2 users highlight that Hazelcast's data replication feature is highly effective, with a score of 8.1, ensuring data consistency across distributed systems, whereas Azure Cosmos DB's replication is also strong but is often seen as more complex to configure.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Cosmos DB's query optimization capabilities are more advanced, providing better performance for complex queries, while Hazelcast's query language received a lower score of 6.7, indicating room for improvement in this area.
- Reviewers say that Hazelcast Platform's built-in search functionality, rated at 7.0, is less robust than Azure Cosmos DB's offerings, which are praised for their comprehensive search capabilities and integration with various analytics tools.
- Users mention that while both platforms provide strong security features, Azure Cosmos DB's encryption and role-based authorization are rated higher, with scores of 8.0 and 8.1 respectively, indicating a more comprehensive approach to data security compared to Hazelcast.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableHazelcast Platform
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableHazelcast Platform
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
8.8
8
Ease of Use
8.2
48
8.5
9
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
8.0
5
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
8.0
5
Quality of Support
8.2
46
8.7
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
47
7.4
9
Features by Category
Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Solution Provision
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Security
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Indexing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Filters
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Query latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data latency
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Connectors
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Scale
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Architecture
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reporting
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.6
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.4
15
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
Availability
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
Security
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
5.6
6
Not enough data
Data Management
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Database
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integrations
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Processing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cosmos DB and Hazelcast Platform are categorized as Key Value Databases and Document Databases
Unique Categories
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS), Graph Databases, and Columnar Databases
Hazelcast Platform is categorized as Event Stream Processing, Data Replication, Stream Analytics, Big Data Processing and Distribution, Real-time Analytic Database, Time Series Databases, and Vector Database
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Hazelcast Platform
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Financial Services
16.7%
Computer Software
16.7%
Transportation/Trucking/Railroad
8.3%
Telecommunications
8.3%
Retail
8.3%
Other
41.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Hazelcast Platform has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
