Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Storage for Firebase 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Dragonfly
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Cosmos DB
Star Rating
(68)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.4% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Cosmos DBGoogle Cloud Storage for Firebase
Star Rating
(19)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Google Cloud Storage for FirebaseAzure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Storage for Firebase
When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Google Cloud Storage for Firebase easier to use, set up, and administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Google Cloud Storage for Firebase overall.
- Reviewers felt that Google Cloud Storage for Firebase meets the needs of their business better than Azure Cosmos DB.
- When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Google Cloud Storage for Firebase is the preferred option.
- For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Azure Cosmos DB over Google Cloud Storage for Firebase.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Cosmos DB
No pricing availableGoogle Cloud Storage for Firebase
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Cosmos DB
No trial information availableGoogle Cloud Storage for Firebase
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.5
48
9.2
16
Ease of Use
8.2
48
9.6
16
Ease of Setup
8.0
22
8.8
7
Ease of Admin
7.7
23
9.0
7
Quality of Support
8.2
46
8.3
12
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
22
9.3
7
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
47
7.7
15
Features by Category
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
8.3
6
Not enough data
7.8
6
Not enough data
7.0
5
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
Availability
7.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Performance
6.7
6
Not enough data
Security
8.1
6
Not enough data
7.7
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
8.0
5
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Availability
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Support
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Configuration
8.6
16
Not enough data
7.8
15
Not enough data
8.3
15
Not enough data
7.2
9
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
Database Administration
8.4
15
Not enough data
7.6
9
Not enough data
7.1
8
Not enough data
Availability
8.9
16
Not enough data
8.3
16
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
8.6
16
Not enough data
Security
7.2
6
Not enough data
7.2
6
Not enough data
5.6
6
Not enough data
Data Management
8.1
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
Database Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Storage for Firebase share no categories
Unique Categories
Azure Cosmos DB is categorized as Database as a Service (DBaaS), Key Value Databases, Document Databases, Graph Databases, and Columnar Databases
Google Cloud Storage for Firebase is categorized as Object-Oriented Databases
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Cosmos DB
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Google Cloud Storage for Firebase
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
23.7%
Computer Software
20.3%
Internet
8.5%
Retail
5.1%
Gambling & Casinos
3.4%
Other
39.0%
Information Technology and Services
15.8%
Education Management
10.5%
Computer Software
10.5%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Retail
5.3%
Other
52.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Azure Cosmos DB has no discussions with answers
Google Cloud Storage for Firebase has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
