Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Apache Camel and IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Omatic Software
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
MindCloud
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Alloy Automation
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Enterprise (61.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us
Apache Camel
Star Rating
(20)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Apache CamelIBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
Star Rating
(265)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (61.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Learn more about IBM webMethods Hybrid IntegrationSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Apache Camel excels in its Integration Variety with a score of 9.0, allowing for seamless connections across various systems, while webMethods Integration, although strong, scores slightly lower in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Apache Camel's Real-Time Integration capabilities are rated at 8.5, providing efficient data flow, whereas webMethods Integration shines with a higher score of 8.8, indicating a more robust real-time processing feature.
- G2 users highlight Apache Camel's Reusable Connectors scoring 8.6, which enhances development efficiency, while webMethods Integration also performs well but does not emphasize this feature as strongly.
- Users on G2 appreciate Apache Camel's Data Mapping capabilities, scoring a perfect 9.0, which simplifies data transformation tasks, while webMethods Integration, although effective, scores slightly lower at 8.5.
- Reviewers say that Apache Camel's API Management features are rated at 8.8, making it a strong choice for managing APIs, while webMethods Integration also offers solid API management but with a slightly lower score.
- Users report that Apache Camel's Backup and Recovery features score 8.4, providing reliable data protection, while webMethods Integration does not specify this feature as prominently, leading to a perception of less emphasis on data recovery solutions.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Apache Camel
No pricing availableIBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
Software AG offer custom webMethods.io API pricing that best fits your business case.
Contact Us
Please contact us for further details and to talk to one of our experts.
- https://www.softwareag.com/en_corporate/contact.html
Free Trial
Apache Camel
No trial information availableIBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
9.0
15
8.6
209
Ease of Use
9.2
15
8.2
215
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
7.7
161
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
7.9
137
Quality of Support
8.6
12
8.1
202
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
8.3
135
Product Direction (% positive)
7.1
16
8.4
202
Features by Category
Functionality
Not enough data
8.2
27
Not enough data
7.8
27
Not enough data
8.0
26
Not enough data
7.9
26
Management
Not enough data
8.1
25
Not enough data
8.6
25
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
8.2
26
Security
Not enough data
8.5
26
Agentic AI - Cloud Migration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Development
Not enough data
8.7
138
Not enough data
8.0
45
Not enough data
7.9
45
Not enough data
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.1
45
Not enough data
8.3
45
Not enough data
8.2
41
Management
Not enough data
8.3
46
Not enough data
8.3
43
Not enough data
8.5
44
Not enough data
8.4
45
Not enough data
8.2
41
Security
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.4
43
Not enough data
8.4
43
Integration Options
Not enough data
8.0
43
Not enough data
7.8
44
Not enough data
7.7
43
Not enough data
7.6
43
Deployment
Not enough data
8.4
41
Not enough data
8.4
40
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Apache Camel and IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration are categorized as Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
Unique Categories
Apache Camel has no unique categories
IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration is categorized as iPaaS, On-Premise Data Integration, and Cloud Migration
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Apache Camel
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
30.0%
Computer Software
10.0%
Utilities
5.0%
Telecommunications
5.0%
Insurance
5.0%
Other
45.0%
Information Technology and Services
18.3%
Computer Software
10.6%
Retail
7.3%
Banking
6.9%
Telecommunications
6.1%
Other
50.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Apache Camel has no discussions with answers
How do I apply for Software AG,Singapore?
1 Comment
MF
Hello Kamalprit,
Here is a link to the currently 5 open positions at Software AG for their Singapore office:...Read more
What is the latest version out in the market?
1 Comment
MF
Hi NIcolas,
I found this Software AG Release Announcement October 2021 post with infos about the latest releases of Software AG products:...Read more
What does Software AG do?
1 Comment
MF
From Software AG about page: https://www.softwareag.com/en_corporate/company.html
Using our industry-leading suite of products across integration & API...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
