Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Altair HyperWorks and OpenFOAM 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.3% of reviews)
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Altair HyperWorks
Star Rating
(54)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (46.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Altair HyperWorksOpenFOAM
Star Rating
(35)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (63.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenFOAMSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenFOAM excels in fluid analysis with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for those focused on computational fluid dynamics, while Altair HyperWorks, with a score of 7.8, is noted for its strength in finite element analysis, scoring 8.8, which appeals to users needing robust structural analysis capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Altair HyperWorks offers superior 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring 8.6 compared to OpenFOAM's 6.2, highlighting features like advanced meshing and geometry creation that streamline the modeling process for users.
- G2 users indicate that the editing tools in Altair HyperWorks are particularly strong, with a score of 9.0, allowing for more intuitive modifications, whereas OpenFOAM's editing tools score 6.8, which some users find less user-friendly.
- Users on G2 report that Altair HyperWorks shines in rendering tools, achieving a score of 9.0, which enhances visualization capabilities, while OpenFOAM's rendering tools score 7.1, indicating a gap in visual output quality that some users find limiting.
- Reviewers say that the hardware support for Altair HyperWorks is robust, scoring 9.3, which is crucial for users with high-performance computing needs, while OpenFOAM's hardware support, scoring 7.1, may not meet the demands of all users, particularly in resource-intensive simulations.
- Users report that Altair HyperWorks provides a better overall user experience with a higher ease of use score of 7.7 compared to OpenFOAM's 6.7, suggesting that new users may find Altair's interface and workflow more accessible and less daunting.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Altair HyperWorks
No pricing availableOpenFOAM
No pricing availableFree Trial
Altair HyperWorks
No trial information availableOpenFOAM
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.4
46
8.0
26
Ease of Use
7.6
46
6.7
26
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
7.6
43
6.1
21
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.9
45
6.1
24
Features by Category
Design
7.6
7
6.2
11
7.5
8
6.1
11
8.3
8
6.8
11
8.3
8
7.1
12
Tools
7.4
7
8.8
13
8.7
9
6.5
8
8.6
7
6.3
8
Work
8.3
7
6.7
8
8.9
6
6.9
9
8.7
5
7.1
8
7.6
7
6.4
7
7.9
7
6.9
9
Environment
8.3
6
7.1
8
8.3
8
6.8
10
8.5
8
7.4
7
7.9
8
7.2
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Altair HyperWorks and OpenFOAM are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Altair HyperWorks has no unique categories
OpenFOAM has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Altair HyperWorks
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
OpenFOAM
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Automotive
35.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.4%
Aviation & Aerospace
7.4%
Higher Education
5.6%
Other
27.8%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
30.3%
Automotive
18.2%
Research
12.1%
Higher Education
9.1%
Oil & Energy
6.1%
Other
24.2%
Alternatives
Discussions
Is HyperWorks and HyperMesh same?
1 Comment
AO
Not exacly sameRead more
Altair HyperWorks has no more discussions with answers
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
OpenFOAM has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
