Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare ACCELQ and Cucumber 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Testiny
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
No pricing available
ACCELQ
Star Rating
(93)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (39.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us 1 User Per Year
Free Trial is available
Browse all 6 pricing plansCucumber
Star Rating
(39)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CucumberSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that ACCELQ excels in ease of use with a score of 9.6, while Cucumber falls behind with a score of 8.0. Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's intuitive interface allows for quicker onboarding and less training time.
- Reviewers say that ACCELQ's test repository functionality is outstanding, scoring 9.8, compared to Cucumber's lack of a dedicated test repository feature. Users on G2 highlight that ACCELQ's organized test management significantly enhances productivity.
- G2 users note that ACCELQ offers superior integration capabilities with a score of 9.6, while Cucumber's integration features are rated lower. Users mention that ACCELQ seamlessly connects with various tools, making it a preferred choice for teams using multiple software solutions.
- Users say that ACCELQ's automation features are robust, scoring 9.8, whereas Cucumber's automation capabilities are rated at 9.7. Reviewers mention that ACCELQ's automation tools allow for more complex scenarios, which is crucial for comprehensive testing.
- Reviewers mention that ACCELQ provides excellent reporting features with a score of 9.5, while Cucumber's reporting capabilities are rated lower. Users report that ACCELQ's detailed analytics help teams make informed decisions based on test results.
- Users on G2 highlight that ACCELQ's product direction is rated a perfect 10.0, indicating strong confidence in its future development, while Cucumber's product direction score of 7.3 raises concerns among users about its long-term viability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
ACCELQ
Automate Manual
Contact Us
1 User Per Year
Next-generation manual testing tool with tracking, traceability, and integrations
- Scenario Designer
- Parameterization and data driven testing
- Parameterization and data driven testing
Cucumber
No pricing availableFree Trial
ACCELQ
Free Trial is available
Cucumber
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
84
8.3
27
Ease of Use
9.5
85
8.1
27
Ease of Setup
9.3
53
8.1
9
Ease of Admin
8.8
20
7.6
7
Quality of Support
9.3
81
8.0
26
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
20
7.4
7
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
79
7.6
24
Features by Category
Functionality
9.8
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
9.7
15
Not enough data
Management
9.5
14
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
9.6
15
Not enough data
Functionality
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.6
20
Not enough data
Management
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.8
20
Not enough data
9.7
20
Not enough data
Functionality
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.5
27
Not enough data
9.7
28
Not enough data
Management
9.8
28
Not enough data
9.5
28
Not enough data
9.6
28
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
70
Not enough data
9.5
70
Not enough data
9.2
69
Not enough data
9.3
69
Not enough data
Automation
9.2
68
Not enough data
9.4
70
Not enough data
9.3
70
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Salesforce AppExchange Apps
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
AI Test Generation & Authoring
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Test Maintenance & Resilience
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Execution & Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
ACCELQ and Cucumber are categorized as Software Testing
Unique Categories
ACCELQ is categorized as Continuous Integration, Automation Testing, Salesforce AppExchange Apps, Test Management, Mobile App Testing, and AI Software Testing Tools
Cucumber has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
ACCELQ
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Cucumber
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
32.3%
Computer Software
14.0%
Hospital & Health Care
5.4%
Financial Services
5.4%
Retail
4.3%
Other
38.7%
Information Technology and Services
29.4%
Computer Software
17.6%
Retail
8.8%
Food & Beverages
5.9%
Financial Services
5.9%
Other
32.4%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Accelq tool?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ offers AI-powered No-Code test automation and management built on a cloud-native platform. ACCELQ provides a unified platform for web, mobile, API,...Read more
Is Accelq open source?
1 Comment
GA
ACCELQ Is currently not Open Source but a commercial tool. You can always take a FREE Trail to check its true power. As "Seeing is Believing,"Read more
ACCELQ has no more discussions with answers
Cucumber has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
