Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Abaqus and Moldflow 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusMoldflow
Star Rating
(28)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.8% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about MoldflowSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Abaqus excels in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, making it a preferred choice for complex simulations, while Moldflow, with a score of 7.3, is seen as less robust in this area.
- Reviewers mention that Moldflow offers superior 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring 8.0 compared to Abaqus's 6.4, which makes it more appealing for users focused on detailed design work.
- G2 users highlight that Moldflow's ease of setup is impressive, scoring 9.0, while Abaqus lacks in this area, indicating that Moldflow may be more user-friendly for new users.
- Users on G2 note that Abaqus has a strong fluid analysis capability with a score of 8.2, which is particularly beneficial for simulations involving fluid dynamics, whereas Moldflow scores lower at 7.5.
- Reviewers say that Moldflow shines in manufacturing process simulation with a score of 8.8, making it a better option for users focused on production efficiency, while Abaqus scores 8.0 in this category.
- Users report that both products have similar command clarity, each scoring 8.6, indicating that users can expect a clear and understandable interface from both Abaqus and Moldflow.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availableMoldflow
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availableMoldflow
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.5
18
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.6
18
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.0
7
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.4
8
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.6
17
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
9.3
7
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
8.6
17
Features by Category
Design
6.4
18
8.0
15
6.6
18
7.8
16
6.5
19
7.8
17
7.0
16
8.2
15
Tools
8.2
14
7.5
12
8.8
22
7.3
13
8.1
16
7.3
10
Work
7.9
15
7.8
10
8.1
13
7.2
10
8.4
18
8.2
11
8.0
14
8.8
13
8.0
11
7.6
11
Environment
7.0
15
8.2
11
8.3
12
7.6
11
8.5
13
8.3
10
8.6
18
8.6
12
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus and Moldflow are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus has no unique categories
Moldflow has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Moldflow
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Automotive
25.0%
Consumer Electronics
16.7%
Plastics
12.5%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
12.5%
Design
8.3%
Other
25.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Moldflow has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
