Compare Abacum and Cube 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (89.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (80.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abacum
Star Rating
(142)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (89.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about AbacumCube
Star Rating
(126)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (80.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about CubeSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Abacum excels in user experience, with a clean and intuitive interface that makes daily tasks easier for finance teams. Users appreciate features like version management, which allows for easy comparison of different scenarios, enhancing their workflow.
- Users say that Cube stands out for its seamless integration with existing systems, making the implementation process refreshingly simple and fast. Reviewers highlight how this integration allows for real-time data retrieval, significantly improving efficiency in reporting and analysis.
- According to verified reviews, Abacum's customer support is highly praised for its responsiveness and the ability to influence product development. Users value having a direct line to support, especially with the added benefit of a US office for timely assistance.
- Reviewers mention that Cube's customer support is also commendable, with many noting the exceptional service provided during the implementation phase. Users have described their support team as one of the best they've experienced, which contributes positively to their overall satisfaction.
- G2 reviewers highlight that while Cube has a strong focus on budgeting and forecasting, Abacum outperforms it in overall user satisfaction metrics, as reflected in its higher G2 scores across various categories, indicating a more favorable reception among users.
- Users report that both products have their strengths, but Abacum's recent reviews indicate a more active user base, with four recent reviews compared to Cube's lack of recent feedback. This suggests that Abacum may be more actively engaged with its users, leading to continuous improvements and updates.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abacum
No pricing availableCube
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abacum
Free Trial is available
Cube
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
126
8.4
102
Ease of Use
9.1
127
8.9
102
Ease of Setup
8.4
105
8.5
55
Ease of Admin
9.1
94
9.0
47
Quality of Support
9.8
122
9.1
101
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.5
92
9.3
49
Product Direction (% positive)
9.7
125
8.9
95
Features by Category
Reports
9.2
32
Not enough data
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.9
31
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
9.3
30
Not enough data
Self Service
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Advanced Analytics
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Reports
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Reports
9.2
32
Not enough data
8.5
32
Not enough data
8.9
31
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
9.3
30
Not enough data
Reports
9.2
27
Not enough data
8.3
26
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
Generative AI
6.4
11
Not enough data
7.4
11
Not enough data
Visualization
9.0
26
Not enough data
9.1
27
Not enough data
9.2
25
Not enough data
8.7
25
Not enough data
Data Updates
9.1
25
Not enough data
8.7
26
Not enough data
Collaboration
9.1
26
Not enough data
8.4
25
Not enough data
7.6
26
Not enough data
Data Updates
9.3
29
Not enough data
8.9
30
Not enough data
7.7
27
Not enough data
Budget Creation
9.4
87
8.2
63
9.2
81
8.6
57
9.2
80
8.6
59
9.1
82
8.1
62
8.5
78
8.0
48
9.4
83
8.8
56
Budget Management
9.5
79
8.7
50
9.3
78
8.2
49
8.9
80
8.1
43
Forecasting
9.5
85
8.8
56
9.1
74
8.9
48
9.0
72
8.6
48
9.3
79
8.4
49
8.3
14
7.7
10
Analytics
9.1
77
8.8
59
9.3
78
8.7
53
9.3
72
8.5
49
Agentic AI - Budgeting and Forecasting
5.9
11
Not enough data
5.8
11
Not enough data
5.6
11
Not enough data
Data Management
9.4
90
8.3
60
9.4
89
8.8
54
9.2
88
8.5
55
Reporting Structure
9.5
85
8.7
50
9.1
86
8.1
49
9.1
90
8.3
46
Standard Analytics
9.3
88
8.1
42
9.1
86
8.0
46
9.5
87
8.6
56
9.4
90
8.4
60
Custom Analytics
9.4
91
6.6
50
9.4
88
7.5
50
9.3
88
8.6
54
9.2
88
8.7
53
9.1
50
8.3
10
Agentic AI - Financial Analysis
5.7
9
Not enough data
5.7
9
Not enough data
Reconciliation
Not enough data
9.1
32
Not enough data
9.1
31
Not enough data
8.6
25
Reporting
Not enough data
9.1
33
Not enough data
8.8
30
Not enough data
9.1
32
Closing Process
Not enough data
8.8
18
Not enough data
8.3
18
Not enough data
9.0
24
AI - Financial Close
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Financial Planning
8.8
46
8.8
12
9.4
59
9.1
19
8.9
60
8.3
17
Agentic AI - FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis)
5.5
11
Not enough data
5.5
11
Not enough data
Financial Insight
9.2
54
9.4
19
9.1
54
9.0
20
9.0
57
9.2
21
Data
8.8
63
7.2
20
9.0
62
8.5
21
8.9
61
9.4
22
8.7
56
8.4
19
Status Communication
9.2
57
8.4
20
9.0
60
9.4
19
9.2
57
7.9
16
8.9
47
7.8
12
Resource Planning - Workforce Planning
9.2
12
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
8.9
12
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
Human Resources - Workforce Planning
8.5
12
Not enough data
6.4
12
Not enough data
6.9
12
Not enough data
7.1
12
Not enough data
Sales Performance Features - Sales Planning
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
Territory Management - Sales Planning
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
Quota & Capacity Management - Sales Planning
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Sales Planning
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Accounting & Finance
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abacum and Cube are categorized as FP&A (Financial Planning & Analysis), Budgeting and Forecasting, and Financial Analysis
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abacum
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Cube
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
23.6%
Information Technology and Services
15.0%
Financial Services
13.6%
Consumer Services
5.0%
Human Resources
4.3%
Other
38.6%
Computer Software
12.7%
Information Technology and Services
12.7%
Financial Services
9.5%
Consumer Goods
4.0%
Health, Wellness and Fitness
4.0%
Other
57.1%
Discussions
Abacum has no discussions with answers
Cube has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
