The visual scenario builder is the main reason I stay. I can see an entire process on one canvas - routers, filters, error handlers - instead of reading through code, so a workflow is much easier to hand over to someone else or to pick up again months later. The execution history is the part I use most. Every run stores the input and output of every single module, so when something breaks I know within a minute which step failed and exactly what data it received. Most automation tools just tell you the run failed and leave you guessing. The app catalog covers most of what I need, and when it doesn't, the generic HTTP and webhook modules mean I'm never actually blocked - I've connected internal APIs that will never have an official integration. Between scheduling, iterators and aggregators, data stores and error handling, a lot of work that would otherwise need a small server and someone maintaining it just doesn't need one.

I use Make to create automations for both learning and freelance client work. Make is really helpful in automating business solutions, saving a lot of time, energy, and improving efficiency. I like the vast number of tools integrated into Make, with over 2,000 apps available, most of which are famous apps, making it easy to connect with any app by searching in Make. The simple drag and drop functionality and settings adjustment inside each module make it very easy to automate business processes and create workflows. The user experience is very good. Another thing I appreciate is their generous free tier, offering about a thousand credits per month, which allows for experimentation with automations.

I like Make's versatility and its ability to encompass so many different softwares and tools, allowing them to talk to each other efficiently. I also appreciate the powerful AI features that are improving over time, making it easier to use. It has helped me set up things that I never would have dreamed of a year ago.