SAP Build Pricing Overview

The best aspects of SAP Build are its seamless integration with the SAP ecosystem, comprehensive low-code and pro-code toolsets, and AI-powered features that enable maximum flexibility and productivity for SAP-centric Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Despite being marketed as low-code, SAP Build requires considerable programming knowledge, which complicates usage for true citizen developers and business users without technical background. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

SAP Build is best because it lets teams quickly create apps, workflows, and automations without changing SAP’s core system, which keeps upgrades safe while dramatically speeding up delivery. It enables business users and functional consultants to build approvals, forms, and simple applications themselves, reducing dependency on developers, while still maintaining governance, security, and SAP UX standards. By running side-by-side with S/4HANA on SAP BTP, SAP Build allows companies to extend SAP cleanly and efficiently, combining enterprise stability with the speed and flexibility usually seen in modern low-code platforms. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The downsides of SAP Build are that it has limited flexibility for complex business logic and performance-heavy scenarios, meaning advanced calculations, highly customized rules, or large-scale data processing still require traditional ABAP or custom development. Licensing and SAP BTP costs can also be high, making it less attractive for smaller teams or simple use cases, and effective use still requires a solid understanding of SAP processes to avoid poorly designed solutions. Additionally, while it accelerates development, it can create long-term dependency on SAP’s ecosystem and tooling, reducing portability and making migrations away from SAP more difficult. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.