What do users say about Make?

I like Make’s integrations with AI tools like Claude and OpenAI, and its seamless integration with cloud connectors. I love that I can use integrations and Claude Code to build scenarios instead of doing it manually. Make also helps me automate integrations and makes repetitive tasks easier. I’m familiar with its UI, so setup felt seamless and straightforward, and Make has been my go-to platform for automations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think Make’s integrations with Claude and its ability to manage webhooks could be a little better, but I don’t really have too many complaints. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like the easy way Make allows for automation of the whole process of sending personalized emails. It auto-creates content with the ChatGPT module, saves it to Word, and sends a .pdf file to the client. This makes it much more manageable than trying to figure out all the automation myself. Also, the capability to go from a ChatGPT prompt to a ready .pdf file is quite valuable. Setting it up was easy because AI assistance was available, and ChatGPT can create whole scenarios, which is a big help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

nothing Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Make.com is an exceptional workflow automation platform. Its visual, drag-and-drop interface makes connecting apps and APIs effortless without writing code. It saves us so much time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing that I can think of at the moment, everything has been a positive experience Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Big canvas to see all your ideas as you build out your scenario with color coded module. Lots of integrations built in and the ability to use APIs for more advanced functions. Works quickly and able to see runs animated through the process. Pricing is reasonable although appears to be increasing. Support appears to be non-existent taking days to respond when I tried to ask Make AI how to use the date functions and it gave me completely bogus information and kept referring to third party modules that required additional account rather than Make's own date functions. AI appears to have improved. Overall Make works well but I wonder if n8n would work better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes I just need to ask a question to a human that knows how to do something and I think the cheaper plans do not include any support. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Make has a nice esthetic and that it can be connected to Claude, which I find useful. The templates are great because they give me an idea of what can be made, making it easier for me to automate processes in my daily pediatric practice and not miss important reminders. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the help section in Make is too long and should be more concise. It would be better if it could summarize or use diagrams or schemes to show solutions. Also, the initial setup was quite challenging since I wasn’t using AI as a connector, though I used it as a tutor. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Make has a clean, user-friendly interface that doesn’t limit what’s possible. It offers a wide range of tools, making it possible to accomplish what used to require a full in-house development team with just 1–2 semi-technical users. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features aren’t as user-friendly as competitors like Zapier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Make to automate workflows and connect different applications, which saves me time and takes care of things for me. I like its simplicity and intuitive interface because it’s very easy to use. I can connect third-party apps with the HTTP module, and I like that the Make Code module lets me run JavaScript to save operations, especially when processing a lot of data. Setup was pretty easy compared with other platforms like n8n and Zapier. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Make is working for me so far, and I can’t think of anything else. Earlier, it was very difficult to find the logs for scenario executions, though I think they’ve improved that now. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to connect to different platforms and pass data along to the next step—similar to BPMN systems—and then automate those processes is a real opportunity. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The navigation to find out how to add credits if I run out of them - I cant find this anywhere Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It does anything I want it too. So far I have found no limitations in what I've been able to do with Make, and have been able to move everything to Make instead of using various tools Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Honestly, nothing at all. It's easy to use, the UI is really good and it's easy to monitor usage. If there was one thing I would change it would be the default frequency of the scenario running when you activate the scenario, as if you forget to change it it can use a lot of credits. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how easy it is to use, and I appreciate the connection possibilities. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most annoying part is that triggers can’t fire immediately like they do in Zapier—for example, when an email is received. Instead, I have to use mailhooks, which is frustrating. I’d really like to see triggers run right away when an email enters a specific folder in Outlook, or when a new row is added to a spreadsheet. As it is now, it’s quite annoying. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.