Comprehensive, all‑in‑one functionality
Users appreciate having many modules in one platform: safety, training (learning), workforce/contractor management, access control, asset tracking, etc. It allows for a more centralised “single source of truth.”
Ease of getting started / set up
For the simpler or standalone parts of the platform, people say setup is fairly straightforward. Uploading components, defining training modules, etc., isn’t overly complicated.
Good value for money, especially considering breadth
Many users think that compared to alternatives, Damstra offers good pricing relative to how many modules/functionalities it brings.
Useful reporting, insights, visibility
The dashboards and reporting tools are frequently cited as beneficial—especially for giving management / safety‑teams good visibility over what’s going on: who’s compliant, what training is due, etc.
Support improving / responsive in many cases
Some reviews mention that Damstra’s support or customer service has been better than expectations, especially when issues have been raised and addressed. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Limited customisation / inflexibility
Users often say that while the core modules are good, it’s hard to “bend” the system to certain specific business needs. For instance: linking modules (e.g. linking risk assessments to PPE, chemicals, people etc.), customizing reports, or tailoring workflows can be difficult.
Learning curve & complexity for more advanced features
For more complex / interrelated functionality (e.g. building training sequences, setting up workflows across modules), some people find it non‑intuitive and requiring a fair amount of effort to understand.
Manual / administrative overhead
A recurring theme: tasks like approvals/rejections, data entry, double entry of fields, etc., are sometimes slow / manual and labour‑intensive. This negates some of the intended efficiencies.
Support / response times and reliability issues
Some users report that customer support can be slow, or that support staff “don’t understand the business / context” leading to rejections of entries that should pass, or difficulty in resolving issues.
Problems with reporting / dashboard transitions
In particular, some complaints concern changes in business intelligence tools (for example, removal of previous reporting tools like Yellowfin) and the replacement ones (e.g. “Insights”) being less capable — missing data or less flexible.
Performance / UI / usability issues
A few users say the GUI is clunky, or that the system is slow (e.g. slow servers, slow to load certain modules or tasks), which dampens the user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.


