What do you like best about Binance?
• Wide asset coverage: more than 350 spot pairs plus perpetual futures on 250+ contracts ensure deep liquidity on almost every major coin.
• Dual interface layout: the Classic view offers simplified charts and order tickets, while Advanced mode layers in TradingView indicators, depth heat-maps and multi-chart grids—switchable in one click.
• Fee structure remains competitive at 0.10% maker/taker and can drop a further 25% when paying with BNB, without tier hurdles that other exchanges impose.
• Integrated yield hub: Simple Earn, Launchpool, dual-investment products and flexible staking let idle balances earn interest directly inside the main wallet—no bridging required.
• Proof-of-Reserves dashboard publishes zk-SNARK attestations on a rolling basis, and the SAFU insurance fund is displayed in real time, adding measurable transparency after industry shake-ups.
• Fiat ramps in 40+ currencies plus the Binance Card streamline exits to everyday spending; SEPA and Faster Payments deposits usually clear within minutes in my experience.
• Copy-friendly Spot Grid, DCA and Rebalancing bots deployable from the same trade ticket, so I can spin up automated strategies without third-party APIs.
• Mobile app mirrors web features almost one-for-one; push notifications for fills, liquidations and funding keep me updated when away from screens. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What do you dislike about Binance?
• Regulatory fragmentation forces U.S. users onto Binance.US with trimmed features and lower liquidity, breaking continuity for multi-region teams.
• Customer support relies on ticket queues; during high-volatility events live chat wait times stretch well past an hour, which is stressful when positions are margin-funded.
BOT Feature:
• No custom indicator stack: the interface locks me into a handful of default signals (AI range, fixed grid width, interval-based DCA). I cannot splice in RSI crossovers, moving-average confluence or custom TradingView webhooks, features that third-party tools like 3Commas or HaasOnline treat as table stakes.
• Missing position-management logic: trailing stop, multi-target take-profit and break-even shifts are absent. A grid run that drifts outside its band simply stalls; I have to intervene manually to close or expand the range, turning “automation” into babysitting during high volatility.
• No backtest or paper-trade sandbox: parameters must be launched live. Competitors provide historical simulations or demo accounts so tweaks don’t burn fees while I iterate. Here every revision spins real orders, and micro-profit grids quickly rack up maker/taker costs that dwarf gains in chop conditions.
• Opaque performance analytics: the dashboard shows cumulative PnL but omits time-weighted returns, drawdown curves or per-leg fee leakage. Without granular stats, refining a strategy is guesswork compared with the detailed logs and CSV exports many standalone bots output. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.