Users report that Tinkercad excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it particularly appealing for beginners and educators, while Sweet Home 3D, with a score of 8.4, is noted to have a steeper learning curve.
Reviewers mention that Tinkercad's cloud-based platform (rated 9.5) allows for easy access and collaboration, whereas Sweet Home 3D, being a downloadable application (rated 6.1), can limit accessibility and sharing capabilities.
G2 users highlight Tinkercad's superior file support, particularly its STL compatibility (rated 9.5), which is crucial for 3D printing, while Sweet Home 3D's mesh repair feature (rated 6.8) is often seen as lacking in effectiveness.
Users on G2 appreciate Tinkercad's integrated 3D modeling capabilities (rated 8.9), which streamline the design process, while Sweet Home 3D's standalone slicer (rated 6.6) is viewed as less efficient for users needing a comprehensive design workflow.
Reviewers mention that Tinkercad's strong community support and resources contribute to its high quality of support rating (8.7), while Sweet Home 3D's support (rated 7.7) is often described as less responsive and helpful.
Users say that Tinkercad's product direction (9.2) is viewed positively, indicating a commitment to continuous improvement, while Sweet Home 3D's lower score (7.8) suggests some users feel it may not be evolving as quickly to meet user needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Sweet Home 3D
No pricing available
Tinkercad
No pricing available
Free Trial
Sweet Home 3D
No trial information available
Tinkercad
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
15
8.6
89
Ease of Use
8.4
15
9.3
91
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.3
17
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
8.9
11
Quality of Support
7.7
10
8.8
72
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.