Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare SAP Engineering Control Center and Teamcenter 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent Meridian
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Accruent RedEye
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Azumuta
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.1% of reviews)
Enterprise (51.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Contact Us
SAP Engineering Control Center
Star Rating
(20)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (42.1% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SAP Engineering Control CenterTeamcenter
Star Rating
(889)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (51.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Teamcenter excels in Document Identification with a score of 9.0, highlighting its robust capabilities in managing and identifying documents effectively, while SAP Engineering Control Center, with a score of 8.6, is noted for its slightly less efficient document management features.
- Reviewers mention that Teamcenter's Quality Management features, particularly in Risk Management (9.4), are superior, providing comprehensive tools for assessing and managing risks, whereas SAP Engineering Control Center, while strong, scores lower in this area, indicating potential gaps in risk assessment functionalities.
- G2 users highlight Teamcenter's strong performance in Version Control (8.9), which is crucial for maintaining the integrity of product data, while SAP Engineering Control Center, with a score of 8.6, is perceived as having slightly less effective version control capabilities, leading to potential challenges in data consistency.
- Users on G2 report that Teamcenter's Analytics & Reporting features are highly rated at 9.2, providing users with powerful tools for data analysis, while SAP Engineering Control Center, scoring 8.5, is seen as offering adequate but less comprehensive analytics options.
- Reviewers mention that Teamcenter's Collaboration tools, particularly in Simultaneous Access (9.0), facilitate better teamwork and document sharing, whereas SAP Engineering Control Center, with a score of 8.9, is effective but may not support as seamless collaboration in real-time.
- Users say that Teamcenter's New Product Introduction features, especially in Time-to-market (8.5), are well-optimized for accelerating product launches, while SAP Engineering Control Center, although competent, does not match the same level of efficiency in this critical area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
SAP Engineering Control Center
No pricing availableTeamcenter
Teamcenter X Standard
Contact Us
- MCAD data management
- Structure management with revisions in CAD software
- Where-used indication
Free Trial
SAP Engineering Control Center
No trial information availableTeamcenter
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
17
8.8
286
Ease of Use
8.3
18
7.6
741
Ease of Setup
8.3
5
6.6
614
Ease of Admin
7.7
5
7.0
108
Quality of Support
8.7
17
8.3
284
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
5
8.0
109
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
18
8.5
273
Features by Category
Metadata
8.2
11
8.9
102
8.8
10
8.4
95
8.1
12
8.8
97
Data Management
8.6
13
8.9
109
8.3
10
8.8
102
8.7
15
8.8
108
8.6
15
9.0
108
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.2
38
Not enough data
7.8
39
Nonconformance
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Quality system
Not enough data
10.0
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Risk Management
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Inspection Management
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.6
8
Compliance
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Platform
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
9.4
8
Not enough data
9.2
8
Services
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.2
8
Not enough data
9.6
8
Data Management
Not enough data
8.9
69
Not enough data
8.7
67
Not enough data
8.8
69
Dashboards
Not enough data
7.8
65
Not enough data
8.4
67
Not enough data
7.9
63
Not enough data
8.0
63
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.8
64
Not enough data
8.8
65
Not enough data
8.8
67
Not enough data
8.4
66
Security
Not enough data
8.9
66
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
66
New Product Introduction
Not enough data
8.6
157
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.4
155
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
155
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
162
|
Verified
CAD
Not enough data
9.0
163
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
161
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
158
|
Verified
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.4
152
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
157
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
160
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
164
|
Verified
Product Data Management
Not enough data
8.8
157
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
157
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.8
157
|
Verified
Bill of Materials
Not enough data
8.9
158
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
154
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
154
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.9
158
|
Verified
Engineering Change Management
Not enough data
8.9
157
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
157
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
146
|
Verified
Simulation
Not enough data
8.3
144
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
147
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
144
|
Verified
Analytics
Not enough data
8.6
153
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.1
143
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
146
|
Verified
Quality management
Not enough data
8.4
141
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.7
145
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
139
|
Verified
Integration
Not enough data
8.5
143
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.5
140
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
134
|
Verified
Not enough data
8.6
141
|
Verified
Generative AI
Not enough data
8.5
74
Not enough data
8.1
74
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
SAP Engineering Control Center and Teamcenter are categorized as Product Data Management (PDM)
Unique Categories
SAP Engineering Control Center has no unique categories
Teamcenter is categorized as Engineering Document Management, Product Lifecycle Management (PLM), and Quality Management (QMS)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
SAP Engineering Control Center
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Teamcenter
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
10.5%
Information Technology and Services
10.5%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
10.5%
Design
10.5%
Automotive
10.5%
Other
47.4%
Automotive
14.8%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.7%
Defense & Space
7.8%
Airlines/Aviation
6.9%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
5.3%
Other
52.4%
Discussions
SAP Engineering Control Center has no discussions with answers
What is Teamcenter used for?
2 Comments
RC
It's a product lifecycle management software.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
