Users report that Pixelmator excels in its ease of use with a score of 8.7, making it a favorite among those who appreciate a user-friendly interface, while Tinkercad shines even brighter with a score of 9.3, indicating a more intuitive experience for beginners.
Reviewers mention that Pixelmator's file editing capabilities are robust, scoring 8.5, but Tinkercad falls short in this area with a lower score of 6.8 for mesh repair, suggesting that users may face challenges when working with complex models.
G2 users highlight that Pixelmator offers strong STL and OBJ compatibility, both scoring 9.5, which is crucial for users needing versatile file formats, whereas Tinkercad's 3MF compatibility is notably weaker at 7.2, limiting its flexibility in file handling.
Users on G2 appreciate Pixelmator's cloud-based platform with a score of 9.5, allowing for easy access and collaboration, while Tinkercad's downloadable application scores only 6.1, indicating a less favorable experience for those who prefer offline work.
Reviewers mention that both products have strong support, with Pixelmator scoring 8.6 and Tinkercad slightly higher at 8.7, suggesting that users can expect reliable assistance from both software options.
Users say that Pixelmator's product direction is rated at 8.6, indicating a solid roadmap for future updates, while Tinkercad outperforms with a score of 9.2, suggesting a more promising trajectory for enhancements and new features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Pixelmator
No pricing available
Tinkercad
No pricing available
Free Trial
Pixelmator
No trial information available
Tinkercad
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.8
78
8.6
89
Ease of Use
8.7
78
9.3
91
Ease of Setup
9.8
9
9.3
17
Ease of Admin
9.5
7
8.9
11
Quality of Support
8.6
53
8.8
72
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.