When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found OpenText SiteScope easier to use and set up. However, Red Hat OpenShift is easier to administer. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Red Hat OpenShift overall.
Reviewers felt that Red Hat OpenShift meets the needs of their business better than OpenText SiteScope.
When comparing quality of ongoing product support, reviewers felt that Red Hat OpenShift is the preferred option.
For feature updates and roadmaps, our reviewers preferred the direction of Red Hat OpenShift over OpenText SiteScope.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText SiteScope
No pricing available
Red Hat OpenShift
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenText SiteScope
No trial information available
Red Hat OpenShift
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.3
20
8.7
83
Ease of Use
8.3
20
8.2
226
Ease of Setup
8.2
12
7.8
193
Ease of Admin
8.3
12
8.6
57
Quality of Support
7.9
19
8.4
73
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What is included in Red Hat OpenShift container platform?
1 Comment
NG
you can deploy your applications and have UI which is more superior to Kubernetes. operator development, etc.. all features of k8s are present in OCP.Read more
Red Hat OpenShift has no more discussions with answers
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.