Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and Opentext functional Testing 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PFLB
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Star Rating
(40)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (76.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Professional Performance EngineeringOpentext functional Testing
Star Rating
(46)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (53.3% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional TestingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional excels in Test Variety with a score of 9.3, allowing for a wide range of testing scenarios, while OpenText UFT One, although strong, scores slightly lower at 8.3 in this area.
- Reviewers mention that the Ease of Setup is a significant advantage for OpenText UFT One, which scored 8.1 compared to LoadRunner's 6.7, making it more user-friendly for new users.
- G2 users highlight the superior Quality of Support for OpenText UFT One, with a score of 8.5, while LoadRunner Professional received a lower score of 7.6, indicating a more responsive support experience with UFT One.
- Users on G2 report that OpenText LoadRunner Professional provides robust Stress Testing capabilities, scoring 8.3, which is crucial for enterprises needing to simulate high-load scenarios effectively.
- Reviewers say that OpenText UFT One shines in Automation with a score of 8.1 for Thoroughness, indicating a more comprehensive approach to automated testing compared to LoadRunner's 7.7.
- Users mention that the Reporting features in OpenText LoadRunner Professional are highly rated at 9.0, providing detailed insights that are essential for performance analysis, whereas UFT One's reporting capabilities are not as highly regarded.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No pricing availableOpentext functional Testing
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
No trial information availableOpentext functional Testing
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.1
23
8.7
40
Ease of Use
8.3
24
8.1
39
Ease of Setup
6.7
9
8.1
19
Ease of Admin
7.4
9
8.2
18
Quality of Support
7.6
24
8.5
38
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
7.8
9
8.4
16
Product Direction (% positive)
8.5
23
8.1
37
Features by Category
Functionality
8.3
7
Not enough data
7.4
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
Reporting
9.0
7
Not enough data
Functionality
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.9
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
8.3
8
Automation
Not enough data
8.1
8
Not enough data
7.7
8
Not enough data
8.1
8
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering and Opentext functional Testing are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering is categorized as Load Testing Tools
Opentext functional Testing has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
47.1%
Computer Software
14.7%
Hospital & Health Care
5.9%
Staffing and Recruiting
2.9%
Sporting Goods
2.9%
Other
26.5%
Information Technology and Services
35.6%
Computer Software
15.6%
Banking
6.7%
Hospital & Health Care
4.4%
Education Management
4.4%
Other
33.3%
Alternatives
Discussions
OpenText Professional Performance Engineering has no discussions with answers
Which feature of Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing displays VBScript code?
1 Comment
SZ
Expert View, In this the users can view and edit the test's source code using VBScriptRead more
Opentext functional Testing has no more discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
