Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare OpenText Static Application Security Testing and Parasoft Jtest 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Aikido Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
OX Security
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Endor Labs
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Star Rating
(24)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (47.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about OpenText Static Application Security TestingParasoft Jtest
Star Rating
(13)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Parasoft JtestSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Parasoft Jtest excels in ease of use with a score of 9.1, while OpenText Fortify Static Code Analyzer has a slightly lower score of 8.7, indicating that Jtest may provide a more user-friendly experience for developers.
- Reviewers mention that Parasoft Jtest offers robust test automation features, scoring 8.5, which is higher than Fortify's score of 7.7 in manual testing, suggesting that Jtest may be better suited for teams looking to streamline their testing processes.
- G2 users highlight the strong quality of support for Parasoft Jtest, with a score of 9.1, compared to Fortify's 8.6, indicating that users may find more responsive assistance when using Jtest.
- Users on G2 report that Parasoft Jtest has a higher detection rate of 8.3, while Fortify's detection rate is not specified, suggesting that Jtest may be more effective in identifying code issues.
- Reviewers say that the API and integrations for Parasoft Jtest score 9.0, showcasing its flexibility in connecting with other tools, whereas Fortify lacks specific ratings in this area, which may limit its integration capabilities.
- Users mention that Parasoft Jtest provides better documentation and remediation suggestions, which can significantly aid developers in addressing code issues, while Fortify's documentation may not be as comprehensive, impacting user experience.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No pricing availableParasoft Jtest
No pricing availableFree Trial
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
No trial information availableParasoft Jtest
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.3
15
8.3
8
Ease of Use
8.7
15
9.1
9
Ease of Setup
8.3
9
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.1
9
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.7
15
9.1
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.5
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.1
13
10.0
5
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
Analysis
8.3
11
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
8.8
11
Not enough data
8.5
10
Not enough data
Testing
8.1
9
Not enough data
6.9
9
Not enough data
8.7
10
Not enough data
8.5
8
Not enough data
7.0
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
6.2
11
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Code Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing and Parasoft Jtest are categorized as Static Code Analysis and Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Unique Categories
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no unique categories
Parasoft Jtest is categorized as Peer Code Review and Secure Code Review
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Parasoft Jtest
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Financial Services
23.8%
Banking
19.0%
Information Technology and Services
14.3%
Computer Software
14.3%
Computer & Network Security
9.5%
Other
19.0%
Computer Software
38.5%
Telecommunications
7.7%
Retail
7.7%
Insurance
7.7%
Information Technology and Services
7.7%
Other
30.8%
Discussions
will provide Video training course for this tool?
1 Comment
SH
Micro Focus has a comprehensive set of free training tools! Check out this one on SCA...Read more
What are the main components of Fortify?
1 Comment
VC
Fortify SSC server
Fortify scan software for windows or Linux Read more
OpenText Static Application Security Testing has no more discussions with answers
Parasoft Jtest has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
