G2 reviewers report that SimScale excels in user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher overall score compared to OpenFOAM. Users appreciate its cloud-based platform and the exceptional technical support provided, making it a preferred choice for those seeking a reliable simulation tool.
According to verified reviews, SimScale's ease of use is a standout feature, with users highlighting its intuitive browser-based interface that simplifies the modeling process. In contrast, OpenFOAM, while customizable, can present a steeper learning curve for new users.
Users say that SimScale's quick implementation process is a major advantage, allowing for a smooth onboarding experience. Reviewers have noted that transitioning from other software, like ANSYS, was seamless, enabling them to focus on engineering tasks rather than setup challenges.
Reviewers mention that while OpenFOAM is praised for its open-source nature and flexibility, it lacks the same level of support and user-friendly features that SimScale offers. Users appreciate the comprehensive documentation of OpenFOAM, but some find the absence of dedicated support a drawback.
According to recent user feedback, SimScale's high scores in support quality and product direction indicate a strong commitment to user needs, with many users feeling that their feedback is valued and acted upon. OpenFOAM, while having a solid user base, does not receive the same level of positive feedback regarding ongoing support and updates.
G2 reviewers highlight that SimScale's performance in fluid and finite element analysis is well-regarded, with users noting its effectiveness in these areas. OpenFOAM also performs well in fluid analysis but falls short in finite element analysis, where SimScale's capabilities are more robust.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
OpenFOAM
No pricing available
SimScale
No pricing available
Free Trial
OpenFOAM
No trial information available
SimScale
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.0
26
8.5
249
Ease of Use
6.7
26
8.7
253
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
9.0
150
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
9.1
27
Quality of Support
6.1
21
9.2
244
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
What do you use as mesher? Are there free ones that are good for complex geometries?
1 Comment
CH
I used snappyHexMesh to mesh a complicated geometry and it did well. Many like cfMesh too. If snappyHexMesh is used, can use blockMesh to generate background...Read more
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.