Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Azure Machine Learning and IBM watsonx.ai 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Alteryx
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Beautiful.ai
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.8% of reviews)
Small-Business (40.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Azure Machine Learning
Star Rating
(88)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (38.8% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Azure Machine LearningIBM watsonx.ai
Star Rating
(122)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (40.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Free Trial is available
Learn more about IBM watsonx.aiSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Azure Machine Learning excels in scalability with a score of 9.0, allowing for efficient handling of large datasets and complex models, while IBM watsonx.ai, although strong, has a slightly lower scalability score of 8.5, which may impact performance in high-demand scenarios.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Machine Learning offers superior data ingestion and wrangling capabilities with a score of 8.7, making it easier to prepare data for analysis compared to IBM watsonx.ai's score of 8.2, which some users find less intuitive.
- G2 users highlight that IBM watsonx.ai shines in ease of use, scoring 9.1, which is higher than Azure Machine Learning's score of 8.6. This user-friendly interface is particularly beneficial for small businesses or users new to machine learning.
- Reviewers say that Azure Machine Learning's model registry feature, scoring 9.3, is highly praised for its organization and management of models, while IBM watsonx.ai's model management features, although effective, score slightly lower at 8.3, indicating room for improvement.
- Users on G2 report that Azure Machine Learning's pre-built algorithms score of 8.3 is competitive, but IBM watsonx.ai's score of 8.7 indicates a broader selection of algorithms that can cater to diverse use cases, making it a more attractive option for users seeking variety.
- Reviewers mention that Azure Machine Learning's deployment ease is rated at 9.0, which is on par with IBM watsonx.ai's score of 8.6, but users appreciate Azure's streamlined process for deploying models into production, making it a preferred choice for teams focused on efficiency.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Azure Machine Learning
No pricing availableIBM watsonx.ai
No pricing availableFree Trial
Azure Machine Learning
No trial information availableIBM watsonx.ai
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.5
81
8.8
77
Ease of Use
8.5
80
8.9
109
Ease of Setup
8.3
57
8.5
100
Ease of Admin
8.3
49
8.7
36
Quality of Support
8.6
74
8.8
76
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.6
47
8.9
36
Product Direction (% positive)
9.0
80
9.9
79
Features by Category
Deployment
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
7.8
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Deployment
Not enough data
9.3
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
8.3
9
Not enough data
8.9
9
Not enough data
9.1
9
Management
Not enough data
8.0
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
Operations
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
8.7
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
Management
Not enough data
8.5
9
Not enough data
9.0
8
Not enough data
8.5
8
Generative AI
Not enough data
9.1
9
Not enough data
9.3
9
System
8.6
22
8.2
31
Model Development
8.6
51
8.6
32
8.9
54
8.2
32
8.3
53
8.7
31
8.7
52
8.4
32
Model Development
8.4
21
8.5
32
Machine/Deep Learning Services
8.1
45
Feature Not Available
7.9
45
8.9
32
7.8
38
8.6
32
8.2
42
8.1
32
Machine/Deep Learning Services
8.7
21
8.5
32
8.5
21
8.8
32
Deployment
8.8
50
8.2
32
8.7
51
8.6
32
8.9
51
8.8
32
Generative AI
8.5
10
8.8
31
8.2
10
8.8
31
7.5
10
Feature Not Available
Agentic AI - Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Data Type
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.5
12
Synthesis Type
Not enough data
9.0
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Data Transformation
Not enough data
8.6
12
Not enough data
9.3
12
Not enough data
9.7
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Not enough data
9.2
12
Scalability and Performance - Generative AI Infrastructure
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Cost and Efficiency - Generative AI Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.3
7
Integration and Extensibility - Generative AI Infrastructure
Not enough data
9.5
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Security and Compliance - Generative AI Infrastructure
Not enough data
8.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Usability and Support - Generative AI Infrastructure
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Content Generation - AI Content Creation Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Management - AI Content Creation Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - Machine Learning
Not enough data
9.0
21
Learning - Machine Learning
Not enough data
9.2
22
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
9.0
21
Prompt Engineering - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
9.2
6
Not enough data
8.1
6
Inference Optimization - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.9
6
Model Garden - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.9
6
Custom Training - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.1
6
Application Development - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.3
6
Model Deployment - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.3
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Guardrails - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
8.6
6
Model Monitoring - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.6
6
Not enough data
8.9
6
Security - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
9.4
6
Not enough data
9.2
6
Gateways & Routers - Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps)
Not enough data
8.9
6
Customization - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Functionality - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
8.6
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.3
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Data and Analytics - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.8
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Integration - AI Agent Builders
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
9.0
7
Not enough data
8.6
7
Data Ingestion & Preparation - Low-Code Machine Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Model Construction & Automation - Low-Code Machine Learning Platforms
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Azure Machine Learning and IBM watsonx.ai are categorized as MLOps Platforms, Large Language Model Operationalization (LLMOps), Data Science and Machine Learning Platforms, Generative AI Infrastructure, and Low-Code Machine Learning Platforms
Unique Categories
Azure Machine Learning has no unique categories
IBM watsonx.ai is categorized as Synthetic Data, Machine Learning, AI Content Creation Platforms, and AI Agent Builders
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Azure Machine Learning
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM watsonx.ai
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
28.2%
Computer Software
14.1%
Management Consulting
8.2%
Education Management
5.9%
Higher Education
4.7%
Other
38.8%
Information Technology and Services
18.9%
Computer Software
11.7%
Consulting
7.2%
Banking
6.3%
Marketing and Advertising
5.4%
Other
50.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is Azure Machine Learning Studio used for?
1 Comment
AR
In short, to build, deploy, and manage high-quality models faster and with confidence.Read more
Azure Machine Learning has no more discussions with answers
IBM watsonx.ai has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
