Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Canonical Kubernetes and SUSE Rancher 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Komodor
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.3% of reviews)
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Canonical Kubernetes
Star Rating
(28)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (39.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Canonical KubernetesSUSE Rancher
Star Rating
(118)4.4 out of 5
Market Segments
Enterprise (42.5% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about SUSE RancherSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Rancher excels in ease of use with a score of 8.9, making it a preferred choice for teams looking for a user-friendly interface, while Kubernetes on Ubuntu, with a score of 8.5, is noted for its slightly steeper learning curve.
- Reviewers mention that Rancher offers robust edge analytics capabilities, scoring 9.2, which is particularly beneficial for organizations needing real-time data processing at the edge, whereas Kubernetes on Ubuntu does not have a dedicated edge analytics feature highlighted by users.
- G2 users indicate that Rancher provides superior access control features with a score of 8.5, allowing for more granular permissions management, while Kubernetes on Ubuntu, scoring 8.0, is perceived as less flexible in this area.
- Users on G2 report that Rancher shines in containerization performance with a score of 9.5, which is crucial for organizations heavily reliant on containerized applications, while Kubernetes on Ubuntu, although strong, scores slightly lower at 9.0.
- Reviewers mention that Rancher’s orchestration capabilities, scoring 8.8, are highly praised for their simplicity and effectiveness, while Kubernetes on Ubuntu leads in this area with a score of 9.1, indicating a more robust orchestration framework.
- Users say that Rancher’s overall product direction is rated positively at 9.6, reflecting confidence in its future development, while Kubernetes on Ubuntu achieves a perfect score of 10.0, suggesting an even stronger commitment to ongoing improvements and community support.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Canonical Kubernetes
No pricing availableSUSE Rancher
No pricing availableFree Trial
Canonical Kubernetes
No trial information availableSUSE Rancher
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.2
12
8.6
89
Ease of Use
8.5
12
8.8
99
Ease of Setup
8.1
9
8.4
69
Ease of Admin
8.3
9
8.7
60
Quality of Support
8.2
11
8.2
80
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.0
8
8.6
54
Product Direction (% positive)
10.0
11
9.6
89
Features by Category
Edge
Not enough data
8.8
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Not enough data
8.7
15
Not enough data
8.8
15
Operations
Not enough data
9.3
15
Not enough data
8.4
15
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Performance
Not enough data
9.5
16
Not enough data
9.0
16
Not enough data
9.1
15
Not enough data
9.2
15
Management
8.0
9
8.5
77
8.5
9
8.4
74
8.5
9
8.1
72
Organization
8.1
9
8.5
75
8.7
9
8.8
74
9.1
9
8.7
75
Development
7.6
9
7.8
72
8.5
9
8.5
74
9.0
8
8.2
72
8.7
9
8.7
74
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Canonical Kubernetes and SUSE Rancher are categorized as Container Management
Unique Categories
Canonical Kubernetes is categorized as Container Orchestration
SUSE Rancher is categorized as IoT Edge Platforms
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Canonical Kubernetes
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
SUSE Rancher
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Information Technology and Services
21.4%
Computer Software
14.3%
Banking
10.7%
Logistics and Supply Chain
7.1%
Design
7.1%
Other
39.3%
Information Technology and Services
25.7%
Computer Software
9.7%
Telecommunications
5.3%
Financial Services
5.3%
Banking
4.4%
Other
49.6%
Alternatives
Discussions
Canonical Kubernetes has no discussions with answers
What are features of Rancher?
1 Comment
EV
Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters. It has the most complete GUI to interact with Kubernetes clusters without diving deep in "kubectl" and YAMLs.Read more
How is Rancher different from Kubernetes?
1 Comment
EV
You don't compare these products. Rancher creates and manages Kubernetes clusters like VMWare ESXi creates and manages virtual machines.Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
