Users report that Wallarm API Security Platform excels in Security Monitoring with a score of 9.4, highlighting its robust capabilities in identifying and mitigating threats in real-time, while HAProxy scores lower at 8.2 in the same category, indicating a potential gap in proactive security measures.
Reviewers mention that Wallarm's Dynamic Image Scanning feature received a perfect score of 10.0, showcasing its effectiveness in identifying vulnerabilities in container images, whereas HAProxy lacks a comparable feature, which may limit its security offerings.
G2 users appreciate Wallarm's Quality of Support, scoring 9.4, with many noting the responsiveness and expertise of the support team, while HAProxy, with a score of 9.0, is still regarded as good but may not match the level of service provided by Wallarm.
Users on G2 highlight Wallarm's superior API Monitoring capabilities, scoring 9.1, which allows for detailed insights into API performance and security, compared to HAProxy's score of 8.6, suggesting that Wallarm offers more comprehensive monitoring tools.
Reviewers say that Wallarm's Security Auditing feature stands out with a score of 9.7, providing thorough assessments of security policies and compliance, while HAProxy's lower score of 8.4 indicates it may not offer the same depth in auditing capabilities.
Users report that Wallarm's Risk Scoring feature, with a score of 9.2, effectively prioritizes vulnerabilities based on potential impact, whereas HAProxy does not have a direct equivalent, which could affect users' ability to manage risks effectively.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.