Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare GitHub and IBM DevOps Release 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Cyclopt Companion
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CAST Highlight
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Codemagic
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
No pricing available
GitHub
Star Rating
(2,268)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (45.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
$0.00 1 users
Browse all 3 pricing plansIBM DevOps Release
Star Rating
(15)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about IBM DevOps ReleaseSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GitHub excels in its Integration capabilities, scoring 9.3, which allows seamless connections with various tools and services. In contrast, IBM UrbanCode Release, while still strong, has a lower score of 8.8, indicating that users find GitHub's integration options more robust and user-friendly.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Ease of Use is rated at 8.7, making it accessible for teams of all sizes, especially small businesses. On the other hand, IBM UrbanCode Release has a slightly lower score of 8.5, suggesting that some users may find it less intuitive, particularly during initial setup.
- G2 users highlight GitHub's superior Deployment Automation features, scoring 8.9, which streamline the release process significantly. In comparison, IBM UrbanCode Release scores 8.1 in this area, indicating that users may experience more complexity in automating their deployment workflows.
- Users on G2 report that GitHub's Task Management features are rated at 8.9, providing a clear and organized way to manage development tasks. Conversely, IBM UrbanCode Release's task management capabilities are rated lower at 8.0, which may lead to challenges in tracking and managing tasks effectively.
- Reviewers mention that GitHub's Quality of Support is rated at 8.7, with many users praising the responsiveness and helpfulness of the support team. In contrast, IBM UrbanCode Release has a score of 8.0, suggesting that users may not always receive the same level of support when encountering issues.
- Users say that GitHub's Product Direction is rated at 8.9, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and feature updates. In comparison, IBM UrbanCode Release has a perfect score of 10.0, which suggests that users feel very confident about its future development and enhancements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
GitHub
Free for Individuals and Organizations
$0.00
1 users
Basics for teams and developers
- Unlimited public/private repositories
- Unlimited collaborators
- 2,000 Actions minutes/month (Free for public repositories)
IBM DevOps Release
No pricing availableFree Trial
GitHub
Free Trial is available
IBM DevOps Release
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.3
1,964
8.7
14
Ease of Use
8.7
1,980
8.6
14
Ease of Setup
9.0
591
8.5
14
Ease of Admin
8.7
451
7.6
7
Quality of Support
8.8
1,571
8.1
14
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
387
8.1
6
Product Direction (% positive)
8.9
1,916
10.0
13
Features by Category
Administration
8.9
142
8.6
11
9.1
147
8.2
11
8.7
144
8.3
10
Functionality
8.9
145
8.2
11
8.6
134
7.7
11
8.9
136
7.4
11
9.0
147
8.2
11
8.3
133
7.7
11
Processes
9.1
146
8.2
11
8.8
144
7.9
11
8.7
142
7.6
11
Administration
9.2
48
Not enough data
9.0
47
Not enough data
Analysis
8.7
47
Not enough data
8.9
50
Not enough data
8.9
48
Not enough data
9.0
50
Not enough data
Testing
9.3
49
Not enough data
8.6
44
Not enough data
8.7
45
Not enough data
8.9
43
Not enough data
8.7
42
Not enough data
9.0
43
Not enough data
8.5
42
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
10.0
14
Not enough data
Administration
9.1
98
Not enough data
9.0
97
Not enough data
8.8
99
Not enough data
9.2
99
Not enough data
Automation
8.9
98
Not enough data
8.7
91
Not enough data
8.8
97
Not enough data
8.9
91
Not enough data
IT Management
9.0
100
Not enough data
9.0
91
Not enough data
8.9
89
Not enough data
Functionality
9.1
238
7.3
5
9.2
241
8.0
5
8.9
238
7.7
5
Management
9.0
236
7.3
5
8.5
231
7.0
5
9.0
239
7.3
5
Agentic AI - Continuous Delivery
9.4
29
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
9.0
29
Not enough data
9.2
30
Not enough data
9.2
29
Not enough data
Bug Reporting
8.9
191
Not enough data
8.9
188
Not enough data
9.0
192
Not enough data
Bug Monitoring
8.5
186
Not enough data
8.9
196
Not enough data
9.0
184
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Bug Tracking
9.5
26
Not enough data
9.4
26
Not enough data
9.3
26
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
74
Not enough data
9.1
79
Not enough data
9.2
78
Not enough data
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.9
76
Not enough data
9.1
78
Not enough data
8.9
76
Not enough data
Management
8.9
137
Not enough data
9.2
138
Not enough data
8.6
133
Not enough data
Functionality
8.8
136
Not enough data
8.9
136
Not enough data
8.7
134
Not enough data
Processes
8.9
137
Not enough data
8.8
134
Not enough data
9.1
139
Not enough data
Functionality
9.3
223
Not enough data
9.0
212
Not enough data
8.7
204
Not enough data
Management
8.9
217
Not enough data
8.9
213
Not enough data
8.3
208
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Continuous Integration
8.9
33
Not enough data
9.0
33
Not enough data
8.9
33
Not enough data
8.5
33
Not enough data
8.8
33
Not enough data
Documentation
8.8
185
Not enough data
8.8
179
Not enough data
8.6
170
Not enough data
Security
8.3
167
Not enough data
8.6
168
Not enough data
9.0
177
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
GitHub and IBM DevOps Release are categorized as Application Release Orchestration and Continuous Delivery
Unique Categories
GitHub is categorized as DevOps Platforms, Software Composition Analysis, Cloud Infrastructure Automation, Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Version Control Hosting, Peer Code Review, Gaming Tools, Bug Tracking, Configuration Management, Continuous Integration, Build Automation, and Secure Code Review
IBM DevOps Release has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
GitHub
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
IBM DevOps Release
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.7%
Information Technology and Services
22.7%
Internet
6.7%
Higher Education
3.4%
Financial Services
3.2%
Other
32.2%
Information Technology and Services
26.7%
Manufacturing
6.7%
Utilities
6.7%
Retail
6.7%
Outsourcing/Offshoring
6.7%
Other
46.7%
Alternatives
Discussions
What is GitHub used for?
8 Comments
MK
- store software source code
- use actions to execute CI / CD and publish artefacts / create releases
- lightweight software project managementRead more
What can GitHub be used for?
5 Comments
MS
It's a platform for version controlling. Where group of people collaborate each other and work on a single project. Read more
What does GitHub mean?
2 Comments
JV
It is a platform for doing projects based on serveral services like website development projects etcRead more
IBM DevOps Release has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
