Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Fooda and Zerocater 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
PostGrid Print & Mail
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.5% of reviews)
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
No pricing available
Fooda
Star Rating
(50)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (73.5% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
Contact Us
Learn more about FoodaZerocater
Star Rating
(11)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (72.7% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ZerocaterSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Fooda excels in "Ease of Setup" with a score of 9.1, making it a preferred choice for companies looking to quickly implement a catering solution. In contrast, ZeroCater does not have a score listed for this category, which may indicate a less streamlined setup process.
- Reviewers mention that Fooda has a lower "Quality of Support" rating at 7.7 compared to ZeroCater's impressive 9.3. This suggests that users of ZeroCater may experience more responsive and helpful customer service when issues arise.
- G2 users highlight that Fooda has a "Meets Requirements" score of 7.6, indicating that while it meets basic needs, it may not fully satisfy all user expectations. ZeroCater, with a higher score of 8.3, appears to better align with user requirements, suggesting a more comprehensive feature set.
- Users on G2 report that Fooda's "Ease of Use" is rated at 8.8, which is higher than ZeroCater's 8.1. This indicates that Fooda may offer a more intuitive user interface, making it easier for employees to navigate and utilize the software effectively.
- Reviewers mention that Fooda has a "Product Direction" score of 5.8, which suggests some concerns about the future development and innovation of the product. In contrast, ZeroCater's lower score of 4.8 may indicate even greater uncertainty regarding its roadmap and enhancements.
- Users say that Fooda has a larger total number of reviews (30) compared to ZeroCater (11), which may provide a more robust set of user experiences to consider when evaluating the software's effectiveness and reliability.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Zerocater
No pricing availableFree Trial
Fooda
No trial information availableZerocater
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.7
42
8.3
9
Ease of Use
9.3
42
8.1
8
Ease of Setup
9.4
33
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.2
16
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
35
9.3
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.3
15
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.2
41
4.8
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Fooda and Zerocater are categorized as On-Demand Catering
Unique Categories
Fooda has no unique categories
Zerocater has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Fooda
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Zerocater
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Internet
14.3%
Marketing and Advertising
12.2%
Financial Services
10.2%
Computer Software
8.2%
Consulting
4.1%
Other
51.0%
Education Management
27.3%
Computer Software
27.3%
Hospitality
18.2%
Internet
9.1%
Information Technology and Services
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Fooda has no discussions with answers
Zerocater has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
