Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Flask and TurboGears 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Flask
Star Rating
(47)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (59.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FlaskTurboGears
Star Rating
(11)3.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (75.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about TurboGearsSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Flask excels in ease of use with a score of 9.3, making it a preferred choice for developers looking for a lightweight framework. In contrast, TurboGears has a lower ease of use rating at 7.7, which some users find less intuitive for beginners.
- Reviewers mention that Flask's flexibility and simplicity allow for rapid development, particularly for small projects, while TurboGears is noted for its more complex setup process, which can be a hurdle for new users.
- G2 users highlight Flask's strong community support, reflected in its quality of support rating of 8.1, compared to TurboGears' 7.9. This community backing is crucial for troubleshooting and finding resources.
- Users on G2 appreciate Flask's high score of 8.8 in ease of setup, which allows developers to get started quickly. Conversely, TurboGears users report a more cumbersome setup experience, which can delay project initiation.
- Reviewers say that Flask has a better product direction with a positive rating of 7.9, indicating a strong roadmap for future development. TurboGears, however, has a lower rating of 4.2, leading some users to question its long-term viability.
- Users report that Flask is particularly favored in the small-business segment, with 57.8% of reviews coming from this market, while TurboGears has an even higher concentration at 75.0%, suggesting it may cater more specifically to small business needs.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Flask
No pricing availableTurboGears
No pricing availableFree Trial
Flask
No trial information availableTurboGears
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
42
7.7
8
Ease of Use
9.3
42
7.7
8
Ease of Setup
8.9
16
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
8.7
15
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
36
7.9
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.7
9
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
8.0
41
4.2
8
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Flask and TurboGears are categorized as Python Web Frameworks
Unique Categories
Flask has no unique categories
TurboGears has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Flask
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
TurboGears
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
31.9%
Information Technology and Services
23.4%
Internet
8.5%
Computer & Network Security
4.3%
Telecommunications
2.1%
Other
29.8%
Computer Software
37.5%
Leisure, Travel & Tourism
12.5%
Internet
12.5%
Information Technology and Services
12.5%
Government Administration
12.5%
Other
12.5%
Discussions
Is Flask reliable for building realtime chat applications?
1 Comment
VG
Yes, it is. You can build realtime chats with flask and Websocket.Read more
Flask has no more discussions with answers
TurboGears has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
