# Top 10 TurboGears Alternatives & Competitors
**Average Rating:** 3.6/5
**Total Number of Reviews:** 11
TurboGears is not the only option for Python Web Frameworks. Explore other competing options and alternatives. Other important factors to consider when researching alternatives to TurboGears include reliability and ease of use. The best overall TurboGears alternative is Django. Other similar apps like TurboGears are Flask, web2py, Pyramid, and Tornado. TurboGears alternatives can be found in [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks).


## Best Paid & Free Alternatives to TurboGears
  - [Django](https://www.g2.com/products/django/reviews)
  - [Flask](https://www.g2.com/products/flask/reviews)
  - [web2py](https://www.g2.com/products/web2py/reviews)
  - [Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/products/pyramid/reviews)
  - [Tornado](https://www.g2.com/products/tornado/reviews)
  - [CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/products/cherrypy/reviews)
  - [Bottle](https://www.g2.com/products/bottle/reviews)
  - [jam.py](https://www.g2.com/products/jam-py/reviews)
  - [Kivy](https://www.g2.com/products/kivy/reviews)
  - [ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/products/arcgis-api-for-python/reviews)

## Top 10 Alternatives to TurboGears Recently Reviewed By G2 Community
Browse options below. Based on reviewer data, you can see how TurboGears stacks up to the competition, check reviews from current & previous users in industries like Computer Software, Accounting, and Government Administration, and find the best product for your business.


  ### 1. [Django](https://www.g2.com/products/django/reviews)
By Django
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 177
Django is a high-level, open-source web framework written in Python that enables rapid development of secure and maintainable websites. It follows the Model-Template-View (MTV) architectural pattern, promoting a clean separation between data models, user interfaces, and application logic. Originally developed to meet the fast-paced demands of newsroom environments, Django has evolved into a versatile framework used by organizations worldwide. Key Features and Functionality: - Rapid Development: Django's design facilitates quick progression from concept to completion, allowing developers to build applications efficiently. - Comprehensive Tools: The framework includes built-in features for user authentication, content administration, site maps, RSS feeds, and more, reducing the need for external libraries. - Security: Django emphasizes security by providing protections against common vulnerabilities such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and cross-site request forgery. - Scalability: Designed to handle high-traffic demands, Django powers some of the busiest sites on the internet, demonstrating its ability to scale effectively. - Versatility: Suitable for a wide range of applications, from content management systems to social networks and scientific computing platforms. Primary Value and User Solutions: Django streamlines the web development process by offering a robust framework that handles many common tasks out of the box. This allows developers to focus on writing unique application features without reinventing the wheel. Its emphasis on security and scalability ensures that applications built with Django are both reliable and capable of growing with user needs. By adhering to the "Don't Repeat Yourself" (DRY) principle, Django promotes code reusability and maintainability, making it an ideal choice for developers aiming to create efficient and secure web applications.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, Django is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-turbogears)
**Compare Django with other alternatives:**
- [Django vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-flask)
- [Django vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-web2py)
- [Django vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-pyramid)
- [Django vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-tornado)
- [Django vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-django)
- [Django vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-django)
- [Django vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-jam-py)
- [Django vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-kivy)
- [Django vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-django)

  ### 2. [Flask](https://www.g2.com/products/flask/reviews)
By BSD
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 49
Flask is a lightweight and versatile web framework for Python, designed to facilitate the development of web applications by providing essential tools and libraries. It adheres to the WSGI (Web Server Gateway Interface) standard, ensuring compatibility with various web servers and applications. Flask's minimalist core allows developers to add extensions as needed, offering flexibility without imposing unnecessary dependencies. Key Features and Functionality: - WSGI Compliance: Flask implements WSGI, the standard Python interface between applications and servers, ensuring seamless integration with various web servers. - Template Rendering: Utilizes Jinja, a powerful template engine, to render dynamic HTML content efficiently. - Secure Data Handling: Incorporates ItsDangerous for securely signing data, protecting against tampering and ensuring data integrity. - Command-Line Interface: Provides the `flask` command through Click, facilitating the management and deployment of applications. - Signal Support: Offers Blinker for implementing signals, enabling components to communicate efficiently within the application. Primary Value and User Solutions: Flask's primary value lies in its simplicity and flexibility, making it an ideal choice for developers seeking to build web applications without the overhead of a full-stack framework. Its modular design allows for the integration of various extensions, enabling the creation of applications tailored to specific needs. By providing essential tools and adhering to standard interfaces, Flask streamlines the development process, allowing developers to focus on crafting unique features and functionalities for their applications.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, Flask is:
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
- Better at support
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-turbogears)
**Compare Flask with other alternatives:**
- [Flask vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-flask)
- [Flask vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-web2py)
- [Flask vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-pyramid)
- [Flask vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-tornado)
- [Flask vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-flask)
- [Flask vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-flask)
- [Flask vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-jam-py)
- [Flask vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-kivy)
- [Flask vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-flask)

  ### 3. [web2py](https://www.g2.com/products/web2py/reviews)
By web2py
**Average Rating:** 4.1/5
**Total Reviews:** 12
Free open source full-stack framework for rapid development of fast, scalable, secure and portable database-driven web-based applications. Written and programmable in Python.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, web2py is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More usable
- Better at support
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/turbogears-vs-web2py)
**Compare web2py with other alternatives:**
- [web2py vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/tornado-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/jam-py-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-web2py)
- [web2py vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-web2py)

  ### 4. [Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/products/pyramid/reviews)
By The Pylons Project
**Average Rating:** 4.4/5
**Total Reviews:** 13
Pyramid is a very general open source Python web framework.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, Pyramid is:
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-turbogears)
**Compare Pyramid with other alternatives:**
- [Pyramid vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-pyramid)
- [Pyramid vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-pyramid)
- [Pyramid vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-web2py)
- [Pyramid vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-tornado)
- [Pyramid vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-pyramid)
- [Pyramid vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-pyramid)
- [Pyramid vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-jam-py)
- [Pyramid vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-pyramid)
- [Pyramid vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-pyramid)

  ### 5. [Tornado](https://www.g2.com/products/tornado/reviews)
By The Apache Software Foundation
**Average Rating:** 3.8/5
**Total Reviews:** 20
Tornado is a Python web framework and asynchronous networking library


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, Tornado is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More expensive
- More usable
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/tornado-vs-turbogears)
**Compare Tornado with other alternatives:**
- [Tornado vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-tornado)
- [Tornado vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-tornado)
- [Tornado vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/tornado-vs-web2py)
- [Tornado vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-tornado)
- [Tornado vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-tornado)
- [Tornado vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-tornado)
- [Tornado vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/tornado-vs-jam-py)
- [Tornado vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-tornado)
- [Tornado vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-tornado)

  ### 6. [CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/products/cherrypy/reviews)
By BSD
**Average Rating:** 3.0/5
**Total Reviews:** 12
A Minimalist Python Web Framework


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, CherryPy is:
- Better at meeting requirements
- More usable
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-turbogears)
**Compare CherryPy with other alternatives:**
- [CherryPy vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-django)
- [CherryPy vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-flask)
- [CherryPy vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-web2py)
- [CherryPy vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-pyramid)
- [CherryPy vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-tornado)
- [CherryPy vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-cherrypy)
- [CherryPy vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-jam-py)
- [CherryPy vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-kivy)
- [CherryPy vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-cherrypy)

  ### 7. [Bottle](https://www.g2.com/products/bottle/reviews)
By Open Source Initiative (OSI)
**Average Rating:** 4.0/5
**Total Reviews:** 13
Bottle is a fast, simple and lightweight WSGI micro web-framework for Python. It is distributed as a single file module and has no dependencies other than the Python Standard Library.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, Bottle is:
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-turbogears)
**Compare Bottle with other alternatives:**
- [Bottle vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-django)
- [Bottle vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-flask)
- [Bottle vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-web2py)
- [Bottle vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-pyramid)
- [Bottle vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-tornado)
- [Bottle vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-cherrypy)
- [Bottle vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-jam-py)
- [Bottle vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-kivy)
- [Bottle vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-bottle)

  ### 8. [jam.py](https://www.g2.com/products/jam-py/reviews)
By Jam-py.com
**Average Rating:** 4.5/5
**Total Reviews:** 12
From an idea of a web db application to a live website in no time, for free. Professionals can use Jam.py to create various tools, dashboards, as well as large-scale business applications with complex internal logic.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, jam.py is:
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
- Better at support
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/turbogears-vs-jam-py)
**Compare jam.py with other alternatives:**
- [jam.py vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/jam-py-vs-web2py)
- [jam.py vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/pyramid-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/tornado-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-jam-py)
- [jam.py vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-jam-py)

  ### 9. [Kivy](https://www.g2.com/products/kivy/reviews)
By Kivy
**Average Rating:** 4.0/5
**Total Reviews:** 21
Kivy is an open source, cross platform Python library the development of application that make use of user interfaces such as multi-touch apps.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, Kivy is:
- More usable
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-turbogears)
**Compare Kivy with other alternatives:**
- [Kivy vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/django-vs-kivy)
- [Kivy vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/flask-vs-kivy)
- [Kivy vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-web2py)
- [Kivy vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-pyramid)
- [Kivy vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-tornado)
- [Kivy vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/cherrypy-vs-kivy)
- [Kivy vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/bottle-vs-kivy)
- [Kivy vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/kivy-vs-jam-py)
- [Kivy vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-kivy)

  ### 10. [ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/products/arcgis-api-for-python/reviews)
By Esri
**Average Rating:** 4.0/5
**Total Reviews:** 15
ArcGIS API for Python is a Python library for working with maps and geospatial data, powered by web GIS. It provides simple and efficient tools for sophisticated vector and raster analysis, geocoding, map making, routing and directions, as well as for organizing and managing a GIS with users, groups and information items.


Reviewers say compared to TurboGears, ArcGIS API for Python is:
- More expensive
- More usable
- Better at meeting requirements
Categories in common with TurboGears: [Python Web Frameworks](https://www.g2.com/categories/python-web-frameworks)

**Compare:** [TurboGears vs ArcGIS API for Python](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-turbogears)
**Compare ArcGIS API for Python with other alternatives:**
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs Django](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-django)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs Flask](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-flask)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs web2py](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-web2py)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs Pyramid](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-pyramid)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs Tornado](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-tornado)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs CherryPy](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-cherrypy)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs Bottle](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-bottle)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs jam.py](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-jam-py)
- [ArcGIS API for Python vs Kivy](https://www.g2.com/compare/arcgis-api-for-python-vs-kivy)


## Explore Articles
- [Which BIM objects platforms let a manufacturer publish and maintain their own product library so specifiers are always accessing current geometry and data?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-bim-objects-platforms-let-a-manufacturer-publish-and-maintain-their-own-product-library-so-specifiers-are-always-accessing-current-geometry-and-data)
- [ConnectWise PSA vs Autotask vs HaloPSA for an MSP with around 20 technicians that wants to stop paying for features they never use?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/connectwise-psa-vs-autotask-vs-halopsa-for-an-msp-with-around-20-technicians-that-wants-to-stop-paying-for-features-they-never-use)
- [Which backend as a service platforms combine scalability, analytics, and user management in one?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/which-backend-as-a-service-platforms-combine-scalability-analytics-and-user-management-in-one)
- [What is the top encryption software for avoiding performance impact on large file operations and transfers?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-is-the-top-encryption-software-for-avoiding-performance-impact-on-large-file-operations-and-transfers)
- [Zero Trust Software](https://www.g2.com/discussions/do-free-options-of-zero-trust-software-work-well)
- [What low-code machine learning platforms do data scientists and engineers actually find reliable enough to use for production workloads rather than just prototyping?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/what-low-code-machine-learning-platforms-do-data-scientists-and-engineers-actually-find-reliable-enough-to-use-for-production-workloads-rather-than-just-prototyping)

## Spotlight Categories
- [Employee Communications Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/employee-communications)
- [Field Service Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/field-service-management)
- [Managed File Transfer (MFT) Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/managed-file-transfer-mft)