Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Cypress and Opentext functional Testing for Developers 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Qase
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
Postman
Visit Website
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
QuerySurge
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Cypress
Star Rating
(107)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (42.3% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Browse all 5 pricing plansOpentext functional Testing for Developers
Star Rating
(12)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (63.6% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Opentext functional Testing for DevelopersSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Cypress excels in ease of use, with a score of 9.3, making it highly accessible for teams looking to implement testing quickly. In contrast, OpenText UFT Developer has a lower ease of use rating at 8.2, which some users find challenging when onboarding new team members.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress offers a free entry-level price, which is particularly appealing for small businesses and startups. On the other hand, OpenText UFT Developer does not have a free tier, which may deter smaller organizations from adopting the software.
- G2 users highlight Cypress's strong test feedback capabilities, allowing for real-time updates and debugging, which enhances the overall testing experience. Conversely, users report that OpenText UFT Developer lacks some of the real-time feedback features, making it less efficient for rapid development cycles.
- Reviewers say that Cypress has a robust automation organization feature, which helps teams manage their test cases effectively. In contrast, OpenText UFT Developer's automation organization is seen as less intuitive, leading to potential confusion among users when managing multiple test scripts.
- Users on G2 emphasize that Cypress has a high product direction score of 9.5, indicating a strong commitment to continuous improvement and innovation. In comparison, OpenText UFT Developer's product direction score of 4.8 suggests that users are less confident in the future development of the software.
- Reviewers mention that Cypress's thoroughness in testing is a standout feature, with many praising its ability to handle complex scenarios seamlessly. OpenText UFT Developer, while functional, is noted by users as being less thorough in certain testing scenarios, which can lead to missed edge cases.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Cypress
OSS - Cypress Test Runner
Free
Always free and open source. No restrictions or limitations.
- http://download.cypress.io/desktop or 'npm install cypress'
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No pricing availableFree Trial
Cypress
Free Trial is available
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
9.0
92
8.5
9
Ease of Use
9.2
93
8.3
9
Ease of Setup
9.3
18
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
9.3
14
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.8
74
8.3
8
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.3
10
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
9.5
90
4.2
8
Features by Category
Functionality
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.0
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
8.7
5
Not enough data
Automation
6.7
5
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Automation Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Software Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Cypress and Opentext functional Testing for Developers are categorized as Software Testing and Automation Testing
Unique Categories
Cypress has no unique categories
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Cypress
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Opentext functional Testing for Developers
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
42.3%
Information Technology and Services
20.2%
Financial Services
7.7%
Program Development
3.8%
Marketing and Advertising
2.9%
Other
23.1%
Computer Software
45.5%
Information Technology and Services
18.2%
Consulting
9.1%
Financial Services
9.1%
Consumer Goods
9.1%
Other
9.1%
Alternatives
Discussions
Are their any resources or individuals to help us connect our app authenticating with IdentityServer
1 Comment
SR
Try cy.pause, intract with app for identity and then resume. Or use api calls.Read more
Is there a plan to add firefox to the list of supported browsers?
1 Comment
SR
Firefox and edge are supported in cypress 4.0Read more
How can I influence my lead QA engineer positively to to use Cypress? Cross-browser is a factor.
1 Comment
SR
Cypress 4.0 add Firefox and edge browsers.Read more
Opentext functional Testing for Developers has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
